Quantum Tunneling and Aschenbach Effect in Nonlinear Einstein-Power-Yang-Mills AdS Black Holes

  • This study explores the thermodynamics, quantum tunneling phenomena, and unique orbital properties of Einstein-Power-Yang-Mills (EPYM) black holes embedded in Anti-de Sitter (AdS) spacetimes, highlighting the role of the nonlinear Yang-Mills (YM) charge parameter γ. We derive explicit expressions for the black hole metric, horizon structure, and associated thermodynamic quantities, including Hawking temperature and phase transitions. Using the WKB approximation and Hamilton-Jacobi formalism, we investigate the quantum tunneling of massive $ W^+ $ bosons, revealing how nonlinear YM interactions significantly alter the radiation spectrum and emission rates. We analyze the effective potential for scalar field propagation, showing that nonlinear YM effects produce distinctive modifications in potential barriers and radiation emission processes. Additionally, our study uncovers the presence of the Aschenbach effect, typically exclusive to rotating black holes, in static and spherically symmetric EPYM black hole solutions.
  • 加载中
  • [1] S Habib Mazharimousavi and Mustafa Halilsoy, Physics Letters B 681, 190 (2009) doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2009.10.006
    [2] MM Stetsko, General Relativity and Gravitation 53, 1 (2021) doi: 10.1007/s10714-020-02776-x
    [3] S Habib Mazharimousavi and Mustafa Halilsoy, Physical Review DParticles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 84, 064032 (2011) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.064032
    [4] Stephen W Hawking and Don N Page, Communications in Mathematical Physics 87, 577 (1983) doi: 10.1007/BF01208266
    [5] Aritra Ghosh and Chandrasekhar Bhamidipati, Physical Review D 100, 126020 (2019) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.126020
    [6] Shao-Wen Wei and Yu-Xiao Liu, Physical Review DParticles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 87, 044014 (2013) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.044014
    [7] David Kubizňák and Robert B Mann, Journal of High Energy Physics 2012, 1 (2012)
    [8] Kourosh Nozari and S Hamid Mehdipour, Classical and Quantum Gravity 25, 175015 (2008) doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/25/17/175015
    [9] Harold Erbin and Vincent Lahoche, Physical Review D 98, 104001 (2018) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.104001
    [10] Qing-Quan Jiang, Shuang-Qing Wu, and Xu Cai, Physical Review DParticles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 73, 064003 (2006) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.064003
    [11] De-You Chen, Qing-Quan Jiang, and Xiao-Tao Zu, Physics Letters B 665, 106 (2008) doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.05.064
    [12] Kimet Jusufi, Izzet Sakallı, and Ali Övgün, General Relativity and Gravitation 50, 10 (2018) doi: 10.1007/s10714-017-2330-8
    [13] I Sakalli and A Ovgun, The European Physical Journal Plus 130, 1 (2015) doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2015-15001-1
    [14] E Sucu and I Sakallı, Physica Scripta 98, 105201 (2023) doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/acf2cf
    [15] Xiang-Qian Li, Physics Letters B 763, 80 (2016) doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.10.032
    [16] YUSUF Sucu and N Unal, The European Physical Journal C-Particles and Fields 44, 287 (2005)
    [17] Xiang-Qian Li and Ge-Rui Chen, Physics letters B 751, 34 (2015) doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.10.007
    [18] Ganim Gecim and Yusuf Sucu, Advances in High Energy Physics 2018, 7031767 (2018)
    [19] Wajiha Javed, Riasat Ali, Rimsha Babar, and Ali Övgün, The European Physical Journal Plus 134, 1 (2019) doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12286-x
    [20] Ganim Gecim and Yusuf Sucu, The European Physical Journal Plus 132, 1 (2017) doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2017-11280-8
    [21] Kimet Jusufi and Ali Övgün, Astrophysics and Space Science 361, 1 (2016) doi: 10.1007/s10509-015-2583-1
    [22] Ganim Gecim and Yusuf Sucu, General Relativity and Gravitation 50, 1 (2018) doi: 10.1007/s10714-017-2322-8
    [23] Emil T Akhmedov, Valeria Akhmedova, and Douglas Singleton, Physics Letters B 642, 124 (2006) doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2006.09.028
    [24] Terry Pilling, Physics Letters B 660, 402 (2008) doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.01.015
    [25] Saeedeh Sadeghian and Hovhannes Demirchian, Physical Review D 104, 124088 (2021) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.124088
    [26] Valeri P Frolov, Pavel Krtouš, and David Kubiznák, Journal of High Energy Physics 2007, 005 (2007)
    [27] Valeria Ferrari and Leonardo Gualtieri, General Relativity and Gravitation 40, 945 (2008) doi: 10.1007/s10714-007-0585-1
    [28] Alessandro Nagar, Olindo Zanotti, Josxe A Font, and Luciano Rezzolla, Physical Review DParticles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 75, 044016 (2007) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.044016
    [29] Erdem Sucu and Izzet Sakallı, Physics of the Dark Universe 47, 101771 (2025) doi: 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101771
    [30] Erdem Sucu and Ali Övgün, Physics of the Dark Universe 44, 101446 (2024) doi: 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101446
    [31] Feng-Yuan Liu, Yi-Fan Mai, Wen-Yu Wu, and Yi Xie, Physics Letters B 795, 475 (2019) doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.06.052
    [32] Mohammad Ali S Afshar and Jafar Sadeghi, Annals of Physics 169953 (2025)
    [33] Shao-Wen Wei and Yu-Xiao Liu, Physics of the Dark Universe 43, 101409 (2024) doi: 10.1016/j.dark.2023.101409
    [34] Zdeněk Stuchlxık, Petr Slanỳ, Gabriel Török, and Marek A Abramowicz, Physical Review DParticles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 71, 024037 (2005) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.024037
    [35] Jafar Khodagholizadeh, Volker Perlick, and Ali Vahedi, Physical Review D 102, 024021 (2020) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.024021
    [36] E Harikumar et al., arXiv preprint arXiv: 2411.11501 (2024).
    [37] Niko Jokela, Keijo Kajantie, and Miika Sarkkinen, Physical Review D 99, 116003 (2019) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.116003
    [38] Saheb Soroushfar, Behnam Pourhassan, and Izzet Sakallı, Physics of the Dark Universe 44, 101457 (2024) doi: 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101457
    [39] Riasat Ali, Rimsha Babar, Houcine Aounallah, and Ali Övgün, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 21, 2450149 (2024) doi: 10.1142/S0219887824501494
    [40] Behnam Pourhassan, Izzet Sakallı, and Aram Bahroz Brzo, The European Physical Journal C 85, 206 (2025) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13893-9
    [41] Behnam Pourhassan, Ali Övgün, and Izzet Sakallı, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 17, 2050156 (2020) doi: 10.1142/S021988782050156X
    [42] Angel Rincxon and Gabriel Gxomez, Physics of the Dark Universe 46, 101576 (2024) doi: 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101576
    [43] Peng-Cheng Li, Tsai-Chen Lee, Minyong Guo, and Bin Chen, Phys. Rev. D 104, 084044 (2021), arXiv: 2105.14268[gr-qc] doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084044
    [44] Yun-Zhi Du, Xiao-Yang Liu, Yang Zhang, Li Zhao, and Qiang Gu, The European Physical Journal C 83, 426 (2023) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11575-y
    [45] Pavan Kumar Yerra and Chandrasekhar Bhamidipati, Modern Physics Letters A 34, 1950216 (2019)
    [46] Jacob D Bekenstein, Physical Review D 7, 2333 (1973)
    [47] Stephen W Hawking, Communications in mathematical physics 43, 199 (1975) doi: 10.1007/BF02345020
    [48] Maulik K Parikh and Frank Wilczek, Physical review letters 85, 5042 (2000) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5042
    [49] Yun-Hao Shi, Run-Qiu Yang, Zhongcheng Xiang, Zi-Yong Ge, Hao Li, Yong-Yi Wang, Kaixuan Huang, Ye Tian, Xiaohui Song, Dongning Zheng, et al., Nature Communications 14, 3263 (2023) doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39064-6
    [50] Zhi-Xuan Ren, Xiao-Xiong Zeng, Yi-Wen Han, and Cheng Hu, Nuclear Physics B 990, 116153 (2023) doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2023.116153
    [51] Marco Angheben, Mario Nadalini, Luciano Vanzo, and Sergio Zerbini, Journal of High Energy Physics 2005, 014 (2005)
    [52] Kimet Jusufi, Europhysics Letters 116, 60013 (2017)
    [53] Ali Övgün and Kimet Jusufi, The European Physical Journal Plus 131, 177 (2016) doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2016-16177-4
    [54] I. Sakalli and A. Övgün, Gen. Rel. Grav. 48, 1 (2016), arXiv: 1507.01753[gr-qc] doi: 10.1007/s10714-015-1997-y
    [55] I. Sakalli, M. Halilsoy, and H. Pasaoglu, Astrophys. Space Sci. 340, 155 (2012), arXiv: 1202.3259[gr-qc] doi: 10.1007/s10509-012-1028-3
    [56] Izzet Sakallı and Esra Yörük, Phys. Scripta 98, 125307 (2023) doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad09a1
    [57] L. Vanzo, G. Acquaviva, and R. Di Criscienzo, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 183001 (2011), arXiv: 1106.4153[gr-qc] doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/28/18/183001
    [58] Kimet Jusufi, Izzet Sakallı, and Alı Övgün, Gen. Rel. Grav. 50, 10 (2018), arXiv: 1709.03923[gr-qc] doi: 10.1007/s10714-017-2330-8
    [59] Izzet Sakalli and Sara Kanzi, Turk. J. Phys. 46, 51 (2022), arXiv: 2205.01771[hep-th] doi: 10.55730/1300-0101.2691
    [60] Mohammad Ali S. Afshar and Jafar Sadeghi, Chinese Physics C (2024).
    [61] Takahisa Igata and Shinya Tomizawa, Physical Review D 102, 084003 (2020) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.084003
    [62] Jafar Sadeghi and Mohammad Ali S Afshar, Astroparticle Physics 162, 102994 (2024) doi: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2024.102994
    [63] L Chakhchi, H El Moumni, and K Masmar, Physical Review D 105, 064031 (2022) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.064031
    [64] Parthajit Biswas, Prateksh Dhivakar, and Nilay Kundu, Journal of High Energy Physics 2022, 1 (2022)
    [65] Hans A Buchdahl, Physical Review 115, 1325 (1959) doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.115.1325
    [66] Emanuele Berti, Vitor Cardoso, and Marc Casals, Physical Review DParticles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 73, 024013 (2006) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.024013
    [67] Sai Iyer and Clifford M Will, Physical Review D 35, 3621 (1987)
    [68] Haidar Sheikhahmadi, Saheb Soroushfar, Seyed Naseh Sajadi, and Tiberiu Harko, The European Physical Journal C 83, 814 (2023) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11980-3
    [69] Yang Guo and Yan-Gang Miao, Physical Review D 102, 064049 (2020) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.064049
    [70] Mikhail S Volkov and Dmitri V Gal’Tsov, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 50, 346 (1989)
    [71] Pedro VP Cunha, Carlos AR Herdeiro, and Eugen Radu, Physical Review D 96, 024039 (2017) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.024039
    [72] Samuel E Gralla, Daniel E Holz, and Robert M Wald, Physical Review D 100, 024018 (2019) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024018
    [73] Vitor Cardoso, Alex S Miranda, Emanuele Berti, Helvi Witek, and Vilson T Zanchin, Physical Review DParticles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 79, 064016 (2009) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.064016
    [74] S Habib Mazharimousavi, The European Physical Journal C 84, 85 (2024) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12447-9
    [75] Kumar S Virbhadra and George FR Ellis, Physical Review D 65, 103004 (2002) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.103004
    [76] Kumar Shwetketu Virbhadra and George FR Ellis, Physical Review D 62, 084003 (2000) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.084003
    [77] Clarissa-Marie Claudel, Kumar Shwetketu Virbhadra, and George FR Ellis, Journal of Mathematical Physics 42, 818 (2001) doi: 10.1063/1.1308507
    [78] Bernd Aschenbach, arXiv preprint arXiv: 0710.3454 (2007).
    [79] B Aschenbach, Astronomy & Astrophysics 425, 1075 (2004)
    [80] Pavan Kumar Yerra, Sudipta Mukherji, and Chandrasekhar Bhamidipati, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2411.01261 (2024).
    [81] Adam R Ingram and Sara E Motta, New Astronomy Reviews 85, 101524 (2019) doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2020.101524
    [82] MD Caballero-Garcxıa, T Belloni, and L Zampieri, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 436, 3262 (2013) doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1807
    [83] P Varniere, R Mignon-Risse, and J Rodriguez, Astronomy & Astrophysics 586, L6 (2016)
    [84] Erdem Sucu and Izzet Sakallı, Nuclear Physics B 116894 (2025)
    [85] Yun-Zhi Du, Huai-Fan Li, Fang Liu, and Li-Chun Zhang, Journal of High Energy Physics 2023, 1 (2023)
    [86] Pedro VP Cunha and Carlos AR Herdeiro, Physical Review Letters 124, 181101 (2020) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.181101
    [87] Gennady S Bisnovatyi-Kogan, Universe 5, 146 (2019) doi: 10.3390/universe5060146
    [88] Rohta Takahashi, The Astrophysical Journal 611, 996 (2004) doi: 10.1086/422403
    [89] Sara E Motta, Astronomische Nachrichten 337, 398 (2016) doi: 10.1002/asna.201612320
    [90] M Kalamkar, Piergiorgio Casella, P Uttley, K O’Brien, D Russell, T Maccarone, M van der Klis, and F Vincentelli, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 460, 3284 (2016) doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1211
    [91] Masahiro Hoshino, Physical review letters 114, 061101 (2015) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.061101
  • 加载中

Figures(3) / Tables(1)

Get Citation
Erdem Sucu and İzzet Sakallı. Quantum Tunneling and Aschenbach Effect in Nonlinear Einstein-Power-Yang-Mills AdS Black Holes[J]. Chinese Physics C.
Erdem Sucu and İzzet Sakallı. Quantum Tunneling and Aschenbach Effect in Nonlinear Einstein-Power-Yang-Mills AdS Black Holes[J]. Chinese Physics C. shu
Milestone
Received: 2025-03-26
Article Metric

Article Views(60)
PDF Downloads(3)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Quantum Tunneling and Aschenbach Effect in Nonlinear Einstein-Power-Yang-Mills AdS Black Holes

  • Physics Department, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, 99628 North Cyprus, via Mersin 10, Turkiye

Abstract: This study explores the thermodynamics, quantum tunneling phenomena, and unique orbital properties of Einstein-Power-Yang-Mills (EPYM) black holes embedded in Anti-de Sitter (AdS) spacetimes, highlighting the role of the nonlinear Yang-Mills (YM) charge parameter γ. We derive explicit expressions for the black hole metric, horizon structure, and associated thermodynamic quantities, including Hawking temperature and phase transitions. Using the WKB approximation and Hamilton-Jacobi formalism, we investigate the quantum tunneling of massive $ W^+ $ bosons, revealing how nonlinear YM interactions significantly alter the radiation spectrum and emission rates. We analyze the effective potential for scalar field propagation, showing that nonlinear YM effects produce distinctive modifications in potential barriers and radiation emission processes. Additionally, our study uncovers the presence of the Aschenbach effect, typically exclusive to rotating black holes, in static and spherically symmetric EPYM black hole solutions.

    HTML

    I.   INTRODUCTION
    • Black holes represent some of the most fascinating objects in theoretical physics, serving as crucial testing grounds for our understanding of gravity in extreme conditions. These enigmatic entities, predicted by Einstein's general relativity, continue to challenge our comprehension of fundamental physics by bringing together concepts from quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and high-energy physics. Among the various theoretical frameworks developed to study black holes, the EPYM model has emerged as particularly significant, offering important insights into how nonlinear gauge fields affect spacetime geometry and related physical phenomena.

      The EPYM theory extends the standard Einstein-Maxwell framework by incorporating nonlinear YM fields characterized by a power parameter γ, which controls the degree of nonlinearity in electromagnetic interactions. This nonlinearity substantially modifies the black hole solution, introducing distinctive features not present in linear theories [13]. The action for the EPYM model typically takes the form

      $ \mathcal{I} = \frac{1}{2}\int d^4x \sqrt{-g}(R - 2\Lambda - [Tr(F^{(a)}_{\mu\nu}F^{(a)\mu\nu})]^{\gamma}), $

      (1)

      where R is the Ricci scalar, Λ is the cosmological constant, and the parameter γ determines the strength of the nonlinearity in the YM field. In AdS backgrounds, these nonlinear effects become particularly pronounced and lead to rich thermodynamic behaviors, including multiple phase transitions and critical phenomena [4, 5].

      The thermodynamic properties of EPYM AdS black holes have attracted considerable attention in recent years, particularly within the context of gauge-gravity duality and the AdS/CFT correspondence [1, 3]. Research has shown that these black holes exhibit complex phase structures reminiscent of van der Waals fluids, with the nonlinearity parameter γ playing a crucial role in determining the critical behavior. Such studies have revealed that EPYM black holes can undergo phase transitions between small and large black hole states, with potential implications for understanding strongly coupled quantum field theories through holographic principles [6, 7].

      Beyond their thermodynamic characteristics, EPYM black holes also exhibit intriguing quantum features, particularly with regard to Hawking radiation and information paradox considerations. The quantum tunneling of particles from the black hole horizon represents a semiclassical approach to understanding Hawking radiation [814]. For EPYM black holes, this process becomes especially complex as a result of the influence of the non-linear YM field on the spacetime geometry. By applying the WKB approximation and the Hamilton-Jacobi formalism, the tunneling probability can be derived for various particles, including scalar particles, fermions, and vector bosons such as $ W^+ $ [1522]. The tunneling rate, related to the imaginary part of the action across the horizon, yields a temperature consistent with the standard thermodynamic definition but modified by nonlinear effects [23, 24].

      The effective potential governing particle motion around EPYM black holes provides another window into their unique physical properties. This potential, derived from the geodesic equations or the Klein-Gordon equation for test fields, characterizes how particles and fields propagate in the black hole spacetime [25, 26]. For EPYM black holes, the effective potential exhibits distinctive features related to the nonlinearity parameter γ, affecting stability regions, particle confinement, and radiation emission profiles. Understanding an effective potential is crucial for predicting observational signatures such as gravitational wave emission, accretion disk properties, and quasinormal modes [27, 28].

      Photon orbits and null geodesics [29] around black holes have become increasingly important with recent advancements in observational astrophysics, particularly with the Event Horizon Telescope's imaging of supermassive black hole shadows. In EPYM black holes, these null geodesics exhibit unique characteristics influenced by the nonlinear YM field. The photon sphere, where light can orbit the black hole in circular paths, plays a critical role in determining the black hole's shadow and lensing properties [30]. For EPYM black holes, the radius of the photon sphere depends non-trivially on the nonlinearity parameter γ, leading to potentially observable effects in strong gravitational lensing scenarios [31].

      One of the most intriguing phenomena in black hole physics is the Aschenbach effect [32, 33], a relativistic effect first identified in rapidly rotating Kerr black holes [34, 35]. This effect manifests as a non-monotonic behavior of the angular velocity of particles in circular orbits as a function of radius, contradicting the standard Keplerian expectation that angular velocity should decrease monotonically with increasing radius [34, 35]. Remarkably, our analysis reveals that this effect can also emerge in spherically symmetric EPYM black holes, despite the absence of rotation. This finding suggests that the nonlinearity of the YM field can mimic certain aspects of rotational effects in spacetime, creating regions where the effective gravitational force exhibits complex radial dependencies [36, 37].

      In this work, we aim to bridge these various perspectives by systematically analyzing the EPYM black hole solution and its physical implications. We first derive the exact metric function for the EPYM AdS black hole and examine its horizon structure and singularities. We then investigate the thermodynamic properties, including temperature, entropy, and phase transitions, with particular attention to how the nonlinearity parameter γ affects critical behavior. Next, we study the quantum tunneling of $ W^+ $ bosons from the EPYM black hole using the WKB approximation, deriving the tunneling probability and the corresponding Hawking temperature. This semiclassical approach allows us to verify the consistency of the quantum and thermodynamic descriptions while revealing quantum corrections induced by the nonlinear field [3841]. A significant portion of our analysis is devoted to understanding the effective potential governing particle motion and field propagation around EPYM black holes. By solving the Klein-Gordon equation in this context, we derive the effective potential and analyze its behavior for different values of the nonlinearity parameter γ. This analysis reveals how the nonlinear YM field modifies the stability regions and radiation characteristics compared to standard black hole solutions [42]. We also extract the effective force from this potential, showing how it transitions from attractive to repulsive regimes under certain conditions, with important implications for particle confinement and accretion processes. Our investigation also extends to photon orbits and null circular geodesics, which determine the optical appearance and shadow of the black hole. By solving the geodesic equations for null particles, we identify the conditions for circular orbits and analyze how their properties depend on the black hole parameters. We also establish a connection between these null geodesics and the orbits with extreme orbital periods, demonstrating that both satisfy the same mathematical condition despite arising from different physical considerations. Perhaps the most surprising result of our study is the identification of the Aschenbach effect in spherically symmetric EPYM black holes. Through a detailed analysis of the angular velocity profile for timelike circular orbits, we establish the conditions under which this effect emerges and relate it to the stability properties of photon spheres. This finding has profound implications for our understanding of relativistic orbital dynamics and suggests that nonlinear electromagnetic fields can induce effects previously thought to require spacetime rotation. It is also worth emphasizing that the theoretical foundation of our integrated approach draws significant inspiration from the rigorous correspondence between eikonal quasinormal modes and unstable fundamental photon orbits, as originally developed in Ref. [43]. That work presents substantial advances in the study of light-ring stability, an aspect that lies at the very heart of this article. This correspondence, formulated in the context of Kerr black holes, establishes the asymptotic quasinormal mode frequency as

      $ \omega = \left(l + \frac{1}{2}\right)\left( \omega_{\mathrm{orb}} + \frac{m}{l + 1/2} \omega_{\mathrm{prec}} \right) - i\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right)\gamma_L, $

      (2)

      where $ \omega_{\mathrm{orb}} $ and $ \omega_{\mathrm{prec}} $ denote the orbital and precessional frequencies of the light ring, and $ \gamma_L $ is the Lyapunov exponent associated with its instability. In our investigation of EPYM AdS black holes, we rely on this foundational structure to identify how photon ring geometry underpins orbital instabilities and facilitates the emergence of relativistic effects such as the Aschenbach phenomenon. Notably, the dynamical stability of light rings also plays a central role in modulating the frequencies of quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs), which are widely regarded as key observational signatures in X-ray binaries and accretion disk systems. In this context, the nonmonotonic angular velocity profiles near the photon sphere, particularly those induced by nonlinear Yang-Mills fields, could imprint detectable structures in QPO spectra.

      The paper is organized as follows. Section II presents a comprehensive review of EPYM black hole solutions in AdS backgrounds, focusing on their metric structure and basic thermodynamic properties. Section III examines the quantum tunneling of $ W^+ $ bosons in the EPYM black hole background, establishing the formalism and deriving expressions for the tunneling probability and Hawking temperature. Section IV analyzes the effective potential governing field propagation and particle motion, with emphasis on its role in radiation emission and its dependence on the nonlinearity parameter. Section V focuses on photon orbits and null circular geodesics, exploring their properties and their connection to the black hole's optical characteristics. Section VI investigates the Aschenbach effect in EPYM black holes, deriving the conditions for its occurrence and discussing its physical significance, particularly in the context of QPOs. Finally, Section VII presents our conclusions and discusses potential directions for future research in this area.

    II.   COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF NONLINEAR YM ADS BLACK HOLES: SOLUTIONS AND THERMODYNAMIC INSIGHTS
    • Nonlinear electrodynamics has emerged as a significant area of research in gravitational physics, offering valuable insights into the behavior of spacetime under extreme conditions. The EPYM theory represents an important extension to standard Einstein-Maxwell theory by incorporating nonlinear YM fields characterized by a power parameter γ. This section provides a comprehensive review of EPYM black hole solutions in AdS backgrounds, focusing on their metric structure, horizon properties, and thermodynamic behavior.

      The action describing four-dimensional EPYM gravity with a cosmological constant Λ is given by Eq. (1) [1]. This nonlinearity parameter γ plays a crucial role in modifying the spacetime geometry and, consequently, the physical properties of the resulting black hole solutions [44].

      The action [1] describing four-dimensional EPYM gravity with a cosmological constant Λ is given by Eq. (1). This nonlinearity parameter γ plays a crucial role in modifying the spacetime geometry and, consequently, the physical properties of the resulting black hole solutions [44]. The field strength tensor for the YM field is expressed as:

      $ F^{(a)}_{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu A^{(a)}_{\nu} - \partial_\nu A^{(a)}_{\mu} + \frac{1}{2\zeta} C^{(a)}_{(b)(c)} A^b_{\mu} A^c_{\nu}, $

      (3)

      where $ C^{(a)}_{(b)(c)} $ are the structure constants of the SU(2) gauge group, reflecting the non-Abelian nature of the YM field. This non-Abelian character, combined with the nonlinear power term, introduces rich and complex behavior not observed in linear electromagnetic theories.

      For completeness, we note that the YM field solution employs the Wu-Yang magnetic ansatz, wherein the YM potential 1-forms are given by [1]:

      $ {A}^{(a)}=\frac{q}{r^2} C_{(i)(j)}^{(a)} x^i d x^j, $

      (4)

      where $ 2 \leq j + 1 \leq i \leq N-1 $, $ 1 \leq a \leq (N - 1)(N - 2)/2 $, $ r^2 = \sum_{i=1}^{N-1} x_i^2 $, and N is the dimension number. This ansatz preserves spherical symmetry while providing a nontrivial YM field configuration that satisfies the YM field equations. The parameter q represents the YM charge, which quantifies the strength of the non-Abelian gauge field. The corresponding $ N=4 $ dimensional black hole metric takes the standard spherically symmetric form:

      $ ds^2 = -f(r) dt^2 + f^{-1}(r) dr^2 + r^2 d\Omega^2_2, $

      (5)

      where $ d\Omega^2_2 $ represents the metric of a unit 2-sphere, and the function $ f(r) $ is given by [1, 45]:

      $ f(r) = 1 - \frac{2M}{r} - \frac{\Lambda}{3} r^2 + \frac{(2q^2)^\gamma}{2(4\gamma - 3)r^{4\gamma - 2}}. $

      (6)

      This solution is valid for $ \gamma \neq 3/4 $, and the YM power term satisfies the weak energy condition (WEC) for $ \gamma > 0 $ [45]. The dimensional parameter γ controls the degree of nonlinearity, with $ \gamma = 1 $ corresponding to the standard YM case.

      The event horizon of the EPYM black hole, denoted by $ r_h $, is determined by solving the equation $ f(r_h) = 0 $. Unlike Schwarzschild or Reissner-Nordström black holes, the horizon structure of EPYM black holes exhibits more complex behavior due to the nonlinear term, potentially allowing for multiple horizons depending on the values of M, q, Λ, and γ. The largest root of $ f(r) = 0 $ corresponds to the event horizon, which separates the interior region from the exterior spacetime accessible to distant observers.

      By computing the expression $ f(r_h) = 0 $, we can express the mass parameter M in terms of the horizon radius and other parameters:

      $ M = \frac{r_h}{2} - \frac{\Lambda r_h^3}{6} + \frac{(2q^2)^\gamma}{2(4\gamma - 3)r_h^{4\gamma - 3}}. $

      (7)

      This relation proves essential for analyzing the thermodynamic properties of the black hole, as it connects the gravitational mass to the horizon geometry and field parameters [46, 47].

    III.   QUANTUM TUNNELING OF BOSONS IN EPYM BLACK HOLE BACKGROUND
    • The quantum tunneling formalism represents one of the most elegant approaches to understanding Hawking radiation from black holes. This section explores the quantum tunneling of massive vector bosons, specifically the $ W^+ $ boson, in the background of EPYM black holes. This investigation not only provides insights into the quantum nature of black hole radiation but also reveals how the nonlinear YM parameter γ influences the emission process [44].

      The quantum tunneling approach, developed by Parikh and Wilczek and later extended to various particle species, offers a semiclassical picture of particle creation near black hole horizons [48]. Unlike Hawking's original derivation, which relied on quantum field theory in curved spacetime, the tunneling method visualizes radiation as a tunneling process through the classically forbidden region at the event horizon. This approach has proven particularly valuable for studying radiation from modified gravity black holes, where the spacetime geometry deviates from those in general relativity [23, 4951].

      In the context of EPYM black holes, mass and charge are not concentrated at a single point but rather spread out due to the nonlinear electromagnetic field. To analyze the tunneling process of vector bosons, we need to consider the appropriate field equations in this curved spacetime background [20, 52].

      The Lagrangian that governs W bosons in an electromagnetic field is given by [17]:

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] L=\;& -\frac{1}{2} ( D_{\mu}^+ W_{\nu}^+ - D_{\nu}^+ W_{\mu}^+ )( D^{-\mu} W^{-\nu} - D^{-\nu} W^{-\mu} ) \\ &+ m_W^2 W_{\mu}^+ W^{-\mu} - i e F_{\mu\nu} W_{\mu}^+ W^{-\nu}, \end{aligned} $

      (8)

      where $ D_{\mu}^{\pm} = \nabla_{\mu} \pm i e A_{\mu} $ is the covariant derivative and $ A_{\mu} = (A_0, 0, 0, 0) $ is the electromagnetic potential of the black hole. The equation of motion for the W boson field is:

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] &\frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}} \partial_{\mu} \left[ \sqrt{-g} \left( D_{\nu}^{\pm} W_{\mu}^{\pm} - D_{\mu}^{\pm} W_{\nu}^{\pm} \right) \right] \\ &\; \pm ie A_{\mu} \left( D_{\nu}^{\pm} W_{\mu}^{\pm} - D_{\mu}^{\pm} W_{\nu}^{\pm} \right) + m_W^2 W_{\nu}^{\pm} \pm i e F^{\nu\mu} W_{\mu}^{\pm} = 0. \end{aligned} $

      (9)

      In this equation, $ F^{\mu\nu} = \nabla^\mu A^\nu - \nabla^\nu A^\mu $ represents the electromagnetic field tensor. Our analysis focuses specifically on the tunneling of the $ W^+ $ boson, though similar principles apply to other vector bosons as well [53].

      To solve these equations semiclassically, we apply the WKB (Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin) approximation, which is valid when the particle's de Broglie wavelength is much smaller than the characteristic curvature radius of the spacetime. Under this approximation, we express the $ W^+ $ boson field as [53]:

      $ W_{\mu}^+(t, r, \theta, \varphi) = b_{\mu}(t, r, \theta, \varphi) \exp \left( \frac{i}{\hbar} I(t, r, \theta, \varphi) \right), $

      (10)

      where $ I(t, r, \theta, \varphi) $ is the action and $ b_{\mu}(t, r, \theta, \varphi) $ represents the amplitude. In the semiclassical limit ($ \hbar \to 0 $), we can neglect the higher-order terms in $ \hbar $, keeping only the leading order. This approximation leads to a system of equations for the components of the vector field.

      Substituting the WKB ansatz into the field equations and keeping only leading-order terms in $ \hbar $, we obtain the following system of equations:

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] & b_0 \left( -(\partial_1 I)^2 - \frac{(\partial_2 I)^2}{r^2 f(r)} - \frac{(\partial_3 I)^2}{r^2 f(r) \sin^2\theta} - \frac{m^2}{f(r)} \right) \\ &+ b_1 (\partial_1 I) (e A_0 + \partial_0 I) + b_2 \left( \frac{(\partial_2 I)}{r^2 f(r)} (e A_0 + \partial_0 I) \right) \\ &+ b_3 \left( \frac{(\partial_3 I)}{r^2 f(r) \sin^2\theta} (e A_0 + \partial_0 I) \right)=0, \end{aligned} $

      (11)

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] \,& b_0 (-\partial_1 I (e A_0 + \partial_0 I)) + b_1 \bigg( \frac{-f(r)(\partial_2 I)^2}{r^2} - \frac{f(r)(\partial_3 I)^2}{r^2 \sin^2\theta} \\ &+ (e A_0 + \partial_0 I)^2 - m^2 f(r) \bigg) + b_2 \left( f(r) \frac{\partial_1 S \partial_2 I}{r^2} \right) \\ &+ b_3 \left( f(r) \frac{\partial_1 I \partial_3 I}{r^2 \sin^2\theta} \right)=0, \end{aligned} $

      (12)

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] \,& b_0 \left( -\frac{\partial_2 I}{f(r)} (e A_0 + \partial_0 I) \right) + b_1 (f(r) \partial_2 I \partial_1 I) \\ &+ b_2 \left( -f(r) (\partial_1 I)^2 - \frac{(\partial_3 I)^2}{r^2 \sin^2\theta} + \frac{(e A_0 + \partial_0 I)^2}{f(r)} - m^2 \right) \\ &+ b_3 \left( \frac{\partial_2 I \partial_3 I}{r^2 \sin^2\theta} \right)=0, \end{aligned} $

      (13)

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] \,& b_0 \left( -\frac{\partial_3 I}{f(r)} (e A_0 + \partial_0 I) \right) + b_1 (f(r) \partial_3 I \partial_1 I) \\ &+ b_3 \left( -f(r) (\partial_1 I)^2 - \frac{(\partial_2 I)^2}{r^2} + \frac{(e A_0 + \partial_0 I)^2}{f(r)} - m^2 \right) \\ &+ b_2 \left( \frac{\partial_2 I \partial_3 I}{r^2} \right)=0. \end{aligned} $

      (14)

      These coupled equations represent the behavior of the vector boson field in the vicinity of the EPYM black hole. For a non-trivial solution to exist, the determinant of the coefficient matrix must vanish, which leads to constraints on the possible values of the action $ I(t, r, \theta, \varphi) $.

      Considering the spherical symmetry of the spacetime, we can form a coefficient matrix ξ whose elements are:

      $ \begin{align} \xi_{11} &= -(\partial_1 I)^2 - \frac{(\partial_2 I)^2}{r^2 f(r)} - \frac{(\partial_3 I)^2}{r^2 f(r) \sin^2\theta} - \frac{m^2}{f(r)}, \end{align} $

      (15)

      $ \begin{align} \xi_{12} &= (\partial_1 I) (e A_0 + \partial_0 I), \end{align} $

      (16)

      $ \begin{align} \xi_{13} &= \frac{(\partial_2 I)}{r^2 f(r)} (e A_0 + \partial_0 I), \end{align} $

      (17)

      $ \begin{align} \xi_{14} &= \frac{(\partial_3 I)}{r^2 f(r) \sin^2\theta} (e A_0 + \partial_0 I), \end{align} $

      (18)

      $ \begin{align} \xi_{21} &= -(\partial_1 I) (e A_0 + \partial_0 I), \end{align} $

      (19)

      $ \begin{align} \xi_{22} &= -f(r) \frac{(\partial_2 I)^2}{r^2} - f(r) \frac{(\partial_3 I)^2}{r^2 \sin^2\theta} + (e A_0 + \partial_0 I)^2 - m^2 f(r), \end{align} $

      (20)

      $ \begin{align} \xi_{23} &= f(r) \frac{\partial_1 I \partial_2 I}{r^2}, \end{align} $

      (21)

      $ \begin{align} \xi_{24} &= f(r) \frac{\partial_1 I \partial_3 I}{r^2 \sin^2\theta}, \end{align} $

      (22)

      $ \begin{align} \xi_{31} &= -\frac{\partial_2 I}{f(r)} (e A_0 + \partial_0 I), \end{align} $

      (23)

      $ \begin{align} \xi_{32} &= f(r) \partial_2 I \partial_1 I, \end{align} $

      (24)

      $ \begin{align} \xi_{33} &= -f(r) (\partial_1 I)^2 - \frac{(\partial_3 I)^2}{r^2 \sin^2\theta} + \frac{(e A_0 + \partial_0 I)^2}{f(r)} - m^2, \end{align} $

      (25)

      $ \begin{align} \xi_{34} &= \frac{\partial_2 I \partial_3 I}{r^2 \sin^2\theta}, \end{align} $

      (26)

      $ \begin{align} \xi_{41} &= -\frac{\partial_3 I}{f(r)} (e A_0 + \partial_0 I), \end{align} $

      (27)

      $ \begin{align} \xi_{42} &= f(r) \partial_3 I \partial_1 I, \end{align} $

      (28)

      $ \begin{align} \xi_{43} &= \frac{\partial_2 I \partial_3 I}{r^2}, \end{align} $

      (29)

      $ \begin{align} \xi_{44} &= -f(r) (\partial_1 I)^2 - \frac{(\partial_2 I)^2}{r^2} + \frac{(e A_0 + \partial_0 I)^2}{f(r)} - m^2. \end{align} $

      (30)

      To solve for the action, we exploit the symmetries of spacetime. Given the static and spherically symmetric nature of the EPYM black hole, we can adopt the following separation ansatz for the action [5458]:

      $ S = -E t + W(r) + j \varphi + H(\theta) + b, $

      (31)

      where E represents the energy of the emitted particle, j is the angular momentum, and b is a constant. Substituting this ansatz into the determinant equation and solving for the radial function $ W(r) $, we obtain:

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] W_{\pm} =\;& \pm \int dr \frac{1}{f(r)} \bigg[E^2 - 2EeA_0 + e^2A_0^2 \\ &- f(r) \left(m^2+\frac{(\partial_2 H)^2}{r^2}\right) \bigg]^{\frac{1}{2}}. \end{aligned} $

      (32)

      This integral describes the radial motion of the $ W^+ $ boson as it tunnels through the event horizon. The signs $ + $ and $ - $ correspond to the outgoing and ingoing solutions, respectively. The tunneling probability is related to the imaginary part of this action[51, 59].

      To evaluate this integral near the horizon, we expand the metric function $ f(r) $ in the vicinity of $ r_h $:

      $ f(r_h) \approx f'(r_h)(r - r_h), $

      (33)

      where the prime denotes differentiation with respect to r. Using this approximation, we can perform the integration across the pole at $ r = r_h $, which yields:

      $ W_{\pm} = \pm i \pi \frac{\sqrt{E^2 - 2EeA_0 + e^2A_0^2}}{f'|_{r_h}}. $

      (34)

      From the standard quantum tunneling formalism, the tunneling probability is given by [53]:

      $ \Gamma = e^{-4 \text{Im} W_+} = e^{- \frac{E_{balance}}{T_H}}, $

      (35)

      where $ E_{balance} = E - eA_0 $ represents the effective energy of the tunneling particle, accounting for electromagnetic interactions. The tunneling process of the $ W_{+} $ boson is analyzed in a semi-classical framework using the WKB approximation. In this approximation, the mass of the $ W^{+} $ boson ($ m_W $) and the tunneling rate are not considered large enough to create a significant feedback effect on the macroscopic geometry of the EPYM black hole. In particular, the energy of a single $ W_{+} $ boson emitted during the tunneling process (E) is very small compared to the total mass M of the black hole ($ E \ll M $). Therefore, the feedback effect of the $ W_{+} $ boson on the black hole background is neglected in this study. Comparing this expression with the Boltzmann factor for thermal radiation, we can identify the Hawking temperature as:

      $ T_H = \frac{1}{4\pi} \left. \frac{df(r)}{dr} \right|_{r_h}. $

      (36)

      By substituting the explicit form of $ f(r) $ for the EPYM black hole, we obtain the expression for the Hawking temperature:

      $ T_H= \frac{M}{2\pi r_h^2} - \frac{\Lambda}{6\pi} r_h - \frac{(2q^2)^\gamma (4\gamma - 2)}{8\pi (4\gamma - 3) r_h^{4\gamma - 1}}. $

      (37)

      This expression reveals how the nonlinear YM parameter γ affects the black hole's thermal radiation. For different values of γ, the temperature profile exhibits distinct behaviors, especially at small horizon radii where nonlinear effects become dominant.

      The variation of Hawking temperature with horizon radius for different values of γ reveals important insights into the thermodynamic stability of EPYM black holes. As shown in Figure 1, the temperature is particularly high for small values of $ r_h $ and decreases rapidly as $ r_h $ increases. The nonlinearity parameter γ significantly affects the temperature profile, with smaller values of γ leading to more pronounced temperature increases at small radii. This behavior has important implications for the final stages of black hole evaporation, suggesting that nonlinear electromagnetic effects could substantially modify the standard picture of black hole thermodynamics.

      Figure 1.  (color online) Plot of Hawking temperature $ T_H $ as a function of the event horizon radius $ r_h $ for different values of γ. The parameters are set to $ M = 5 $, $ \Lambda = 0.1 $, and $ q = 0.5 $. The dashed line represents $ T_H = 0 $, indicating the extremal black hole condition.

      The tunneling approach provides a physically intuitive picture of Hawking radiation from EPYM black holes and allows us to incorporate the effects of nonlinear electrodynamics on the emission process. This analysis not only confirms the thermodynamic temperature derived through other methods but also offers insights into how massive vector bosons are emitted from these black holes. The dependence of the tunneling probability on the nonlinearity parameter γ highlights the influence of nonlinear electrodynamics on quantum processes in strong gravitational fields.

    IV.   ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVE POTENTIAL AND ITS ROLE IN RADIATION EMISSION
    • The effective potential governing particle motion in black hole spacetimes provides crucial insights into various astrophysical phenomena, including radiation emission processes, particle confinement, and the stability of orbits. For EPYM black holes, the effective potential exhibits unique features due to the nonlinear YM field, which significantly alters the spacetime geometry compared to standard solutions in general relativity. This section presents a detailed analysis of the effective potential for scalar field propagation around EPYM black holes and examines its implications for radiation processes.

      The effective potential approach has proven invaluable in understanding black hole physics across various contexts. In classical general relativity, it provides a framework for analyzing the stability of particle orbits and the behavior of test fields in black hole backgrounds [6062]. In semiclassical gravity, the effective potential governs the greybody factors that modify the black body spectrum of Hawking radiation, accounting for the backscattering of emitted particles by the spacetime curvature. The unique features of the effective potential in modified gravity theories like EPYM can lead to distinctive observational signatures that potentially differentiate these black holes from their counterparts in general relativity.

      The nonlinear nature of the YM field in EPYM theory introduces additional complexity to the effective potential, particularly through the parameter γ that controls the degree of nonlinearity. This parameter significantly influences the shape and behavior of the potential, especially at small radial distances where the nonlinear electromagnetic effects become dominant [63]. Understanding these modifications is essential for predicting the radiation spectrum, absorption cross-sections, and quasinormal modes of EPYM black holes, which could potentially be detected by current and future gravitational wave observatories.

      In this section, we obtain the effective potential by analyzing the propagation of scalar fields in the background of the static and spherically symmetric EPYM black hole (5) defined by metric function (6). While this approach focuses on scalar fields for simplicity, the qualitative features extend to higher-spin fields as well, with appropriate modifications to account for spin-curvature coupling. The resulting effective potential encapsulates the essential physics of wave propagation in this curved spacetime and provides a foundation for understanding more complex radiation processes.

      To analyze the propagation of a scalar field in the EPYM black hole background, we begin with the Klein-Gordon equation for a minimally coupled scalar field Ξ:

      $ \partial_\mu [\sqrt{-g} g^{\mu\nu} \partial_\nu \Xi] = 0. $

      (38)

      This equation describes the behavior of a massless scalar field in curved spacetime, assuming minimal coupling between the field and gravity [64, 65]. For the spherically symmetric spacetime under consideration, we can separate the variables using the decomposition method:

      $ \Xi = e^{-i\omega t} R_{\omega l m}(r) Y_l^m(\theta, \phi). $

      (39)

      Here, ω represents the frequency of the field, $ R_{\omega l m}(r) $ is the radial function, and $ Y_l^m(\theta, \phi) $ are the spherical harmonics that capture the angular dependence of the field. Substituting this decomposition into the Klein-Gordon equation and using the metric components of the EPYM black hole, we obtain separate equations for the radial and angular parts:

      $ \frac{1}{r^2} \frac{d}{dr} \left( r^2 f \frac{dR_{\omega l m}}{dr} \right) + \left( \frac{\omega^2}{f} - \frac{\lambda_l}{r^2} \right) R_{\omega l m} = 0, $

      (40)

      $ \frac{1}{\sin \theta} \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta} \left( \sin \theta \frac{\partial Y_l^m}{\partial \theta} \right) + \frac{1}{\sin^2 \theta} \frac{\partial^2 Y_l^m}{\partial \phi^2} + \lambda_l Y_l^m = 0. $

      (41)

      The angular equation is the standard eigenvalue equation for spherical harmonics, with eigenvalue $ \lambda_l $ related to the angular momentum quantum number l. For a scalar field in spherically symmetric spacetime, $ \lambda_l = l(l+1) $. In more general contexts, particularly for rotating black holes, the separation constant may have a more complex form, as given by the power series expansion [66]:

      $ \lambda_l = \sum\limits_{k=0}^{\infty} (a \omega)^k F_{l,k}, \quad \lambda_l = l(l+1) $

      (42)

      where a is the spin parameter of the black hole and $ F_{l,k} $ are coefficients dependent on the specific problem. The angular momentum satisfies conditions $ l \geq |m| $ and $ \dfrac{l - |m|}{2} \in (0, \mathbb{Z}) $.

      To derive the effective potential that governs the radial propagation of the field, we introduce the tortoise coordinate $ v^\star $ defined by the relation:

      $ \frac{dv^\star}{dr} = \frac{1}{f}, \quad \frac{d}{dv^\star} = f \frac{d}{dr}, \quad \frac{d^2}{dv^{\star 2}} = f \left( \frac{d^2}{dr^2} + \frac{df}{dr} \frac{d}{dr} \right). $

      (43)

      This coordinate transformation is standard in black hole physics and has the advantage of mapping the event horizon to $ v^\star \to -\infty $ while asymptotic infinity corresponds to $ v^\star \to \infty $. This transformation simplifies the wave equation and provides a clear physical interpretation in terms of wave propagation. Additionally, we rescale the radial function as:

      $ R_{\omega l m}(r) = \frac{T_{\omega l m}(r)}{r}, $

      (44)

      which removes the first-derivative term in the radial equation. After these transformations, the radial equation becomes:

      $ \left( \frac{d^2}{dv^{\star 2}} - V_{\text{eff}} \right) T_{\omega l m} = 0, $

      (45)

      where the effective potential $ V_{\text{eff}} $ is given by:

      $ V_{\text{eff}} = f(r) \left( \frac{1}{r} \frac{d f(r)}{dr} - \omega^2 + \frac{l(l+1)}{r^2} \right) $

      (46)

      Substituting the specific form of $ f(r) $ for the EPYM black hole, we obtain:

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] V_{\text{eff}} =\;& \left( 1 - \frac{2M}{r} - \frac{\Lambda}{3} r^2 + \frac{(2q^2)^\gamma}{2(4\gamma - 3)r^{4\gamma - 2}} \right)\\ & \times \left( \frac{2M}{r^3} - \frac{2\Lambda}{3} - \frac{(2q^2)^\gamma(4\gamma - 2)}{2(4\gamma - 3)r^{4\gamma}} - \omega^2 + \frac{l(l+1)}{r^2} \right) \end{aligned} $

      (47)

      This expression reveals how the effective potential depends on the black hole parameters (M, q, Λ), the nonlinearity parameter γ, the field frequency ω, and the angular momentum quantum number l. The behavior of this potential determines various physical properties of the black hole, including its stability, radiation spectrum, and quasinormal modes.

      Figure 2 illustrates the variation of the effective potential $ V_{\text{eff}} $ with respect to the radial coordinate r for different values of the nonlinearity parameter γ. The graph reveals several important features of the potential profile:

      Figure 2.  (color online) Variation of the effective potential $ V_{\text{eff}} $ as a function of r for different values of γ ($ \gamma = 0.1, 0.5, 1 $). The parameters used are $ M = 1 $, $ q = 1 $, $ \Lambda = 0.1 $, $ \omega = 0.5 $, and $ l = 1 $. The behavior of $ V_{\text{eff}} $ changes significantly for small r values, especially for lower γ, while converging for larger r.

      For small values of r ($ r < 3 $), the effective potential shows a steep decrease to negative values, with this decline more pronounced for smaller values of γ ($ \gamma = 0.1, 0.5 $). This behavior indicates the strong influence of nonlinear electromagnetic corrections in regions close to the black hole. In the intermediate region ($ 3 \leq r \leq 6 $), the potential approaches zero, while for large values of r ($ r > 6 $), all curves converge to positive values as the effects of the cosmological constant become dominant.

      The shape of the effective potential has important implications for radiation processes. Regions where the potential forms a barrier (positive values) tend to reflect incoming waves, while regions with negative potential values allow for transmission [67]. For EPYM black holes, the potential barrier is modified by the nonlinearity parameter γ, which affects both the height and width of the barrier. Lower values of γ create a deeper negative well near the horizon, potentially enhancing the emission of low-frequency radiation, while also forming a higher barrier at intermediate distances that could suppress high-frequency emission [68].

    • A.   Effective Force

    • Beyond the effective potential, the effective force experienced by test particles provides another important perspective on the gravitational dynamics around EPYM black holes. The effective force serves as an indicator of whether a test particle in the gravitational field is attracted toward or repelled from the central mass. Mathematically, the effective force experienced by a particle in a gravitational field is given by:

      $ F = -\frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial V_{\text{eff}}}{\partial r}. $

      (48)

      For the EPYM black hole metric considered in this study, the effective force takes the form:

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] F_{eff} =\;& \left( \frac{1}{2} - \frac{M}{r} - \frac{\Lambda}{6} r^2 + \frac{(2q^2)^\gamma}{4(4\gamma - 3)r^{4\gamma - 2}} \right)\\& \times \Bigg( \frac{6M}{r^4} - \frac{2l(l+1)}{r^3} - \frac{(2q^2)^\gamma(4\gamma - 2)(4\gamma)} {2(4\gamma - 3)r^{4\gamma +1}} \Bigg) \\ & + \Bigg( -\frac{M}{r^3} + \frac{\Lambda}{3} + \frac{(2q^2)^\gamma(4\gamma - 2)}{4(4\gamma - 3)r^{4\gamma}} + \frac{\omega^2}{2} - \frac{l(l+1)}{2r^2} \Bigg) \\ &\times \Bigg( \frac{2M}{r^2} - \frac{2\Lambda}{3} r - \frac{(2q^2)^\gamma (4\gamma - 2)}{2(4\gamma - 3) r^{4\gamma - 1}} \Bigg). \end{aligned} $

      (49)

      This complex expression reflects the interplay between various factors affecting particle dynamics in the EPYM black hole spacetime. The effective force depends not only on the black hole parameters (M, q, Λ) and the nonlinearity parameter γ but also on the frequency parameter ω and the angular momentum quantum number l of the test particle. The radial dependence of the force reveals how particles at different distances from the black hole experience different gravitational effects.

      Figure 3 illustrates the variation of the effective force $ F_{\text{eff}} $ with respect to the radial coordinate r for different values of the nonlinearity parameter γ:

      Figure 3.  (color online) The variation of the effective force $ F_{\text{eff}} $ with respect to the radial coordinate r for different values of γ. The parameters are chosen as $ M = 1 $, $ q = 0.5 $, $ \Lambda = 0.1 $, $ l = 1 $, and $ \omega = 0.5 $. The results indicate that for smaller values of γ, the attractive force is stronger near the center, while for larger γ, the force weakens and transitions to a repulsive regime at larger r.

      The graph reveals several important features of the force profile. For small values of r, the effective force is negative, indicating an attractive force that pulls the test particles toward the central mass. For smaller values of γ ($ \gamma = 0.1 $ and $ \gamma = 0.5 $), the magnitude of this attractive force is significantly higher, suggesting a stronger gravitational pull in regions close to the black hole. In contrast, for larger values of γ ($ \gamma = 1 $), the force has a smaller magnitude and transitions to positive values (repulsive force) at larger radii.

      These results demonstrate how the nonlinearity parameter γ fundamentally alters the gravitational dynamics around EPYM black holes. Lower values of γ enhance the attractive force, making it more difficult for particles to escape from regions close to the black hole. This has important implications for accretion processes, as the enhanced gravitational pull could lead to higher accretion rates and more efficient energy extraction. Conversely, higher values of γ weaken central attraction and introduce repulsive effects at larger distances, potentially creating stable orbits where standard general relativity would predict instability.

      The effective potential and force analyses provide valuable insights into the radiation emission processes from EPYM black holes. The modified potential barrier affects the transmission and reflection coefficients for waves propagating in this spacetime, directly influencing the spectrum of emitted radiation [69]. The deeper negative well near the horizon for lower γ values suggests enhanced emission of low-frequency radiation, while the higher barrier at intermediate distances could suppress high-frequency components, leading to a modified black-body spectrum compared to standard Schwarzschild black holes [70]. Additionally, the effective force profile affects the dynamics of charged particles around the black hole, which can generate secondary radiation through processes like synchrotron emission and bremsstrahlung. The stronger attractive force for lower γ values could accelerate charged particles to higher energies, potentially leading to more energetic radiation signatures. These distinctive features in the radiation spectrum could provide observational tests for the existence of nonlinear electromagnetic effects in astrophysical black holes.

    V.   PHOTON ORBITS AND NULL CIRCULAR GEODESICS IN EPYM BLACK HOLES
    • The analysis of null geodesics presented in this section serves as a critical methodological bridge connecting the quantum tunneling phenomena examined in Section III with the Aschenbach effect investigated in Section VI. While these phenomena appear distinct, they share a fundamental dependence on the metric function $ f(r) $ that characterizes EPYM black holes. The mathematical condition for null circular geodesics, which can be derived as $ 2f(r) - rf'(r) = 0 $, directly relates to the parametric conditions that govern the emergence of the Aschenbach effect through the criterion $ rf''(r) - f'(r) > 0 $. This interconnection reveals how the nonlinearity parameter γ, which modifies quantum tunneling rates through its influence on spacetime geometry, simultaneously creates the distinctive conditions required for both photon sphere formation and the non-monotonic orbital velocity profiles characteristic of the Aschenbach effect. This integrated theoretical approach thus illuminates how nonlinear electromagnetic fields fundamentally alter both quantum and relativistic orbital dynamics.

      The study of null geodesics, particularly circular-photon orbits, provides crucial insights into the optical properties and causal structure of black hole spacetimes. For EPYM black holes, these geodesics exhibit distinctive features due to the nonlinear YM field, which significantly alters the spacetime geometry compared to solutions in general relativity. This section presents a detailed analysis of null circular geodesics in EPYM black holes and examines their implications for observable phenomena such as black hole shadows and gravitational lensing.

      Photon orbits play a fundamental role in determining the optical appearance of black holes to distant observers [71]. The photon sphere, a region where light can travel in unstable circular orbits, forms the boundary of the black hole shadow and governs strong gravitational lensing effects [72]. In standard general relativity, the photon sphere of a Schwarzschild black hole is located at $ r = 3M $, while for charged and rotating black holes, its position depends on the charge and spin parameters. For EPYM black holes, the nonlinear YM field introduces additional complexity, with the photon sphere location depending non-trivially on the nonlinearity parameter γ.

      In this section, we investigate the physical and mathematical properties of null circular geodesics in the background of EPYM black holes. Our analysis focuses primarily on null circular geodesics in the equatorial plane ($ \theta = \pi/2 $), which captures the essential features of the orbital dynamics of photons. Following the study [73], we obtain the equation of a null circular geodesic. The Lagrangian that defines the geodesics is as follows:

      $ 2\mathcal{L} = -f(r) \dot{t}^2 + f^{-1}(r) \dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\phi}^2. $

      (50)

      Here, a dot denotes the derivative with respect to an affine parameter along the geodesic. Since the Lagrangian does not depend on the coordinates t and ϕ, the corresponding conserved quantities are called E (energy) and L (angular momentum). The generalized momentum components derived from the Lagrangian are expressed as follows [73]:

      $ p_t = g_{tt} \dot{t} = -f(r) \dot{t} = -E = \text{const}, $

      (51)

      $ p_\phi = g_{\phi\phi} \dot{\phi} = r^2 \dot{\phi} = L = \text{const}, $

      (52)

      $ p_r = g_{rr} \dot{r} = f^{-1}(r) \dot{r}. $

      (53)

      The Hamiltonian of the system is given by:

      $ H = p_t \dot{t} + p_r \dot{r} + p_\phi \dot{\phi} - L $

      (54)

      and satisfies the condition:

      $ 2H = -E \dot{t} + L \dot{\phi} + g_{rr} \dot{r}^2 = \xi = \text{const} $

      (55)

      Here, $ \xi = 0 $ is taken for null geodesics, which corresponds to the case of massless particles such as photons.

      From the conserved quantities, we obtain the following relations:

      $ \dot{t} = \frac{E}{f(r)}, \quad \dot{\phi} = \frac{L}{r^2}. $

      (56)

      When these are substituted into the Hamiltonian constraint equation, we get:

      $ \dot{r}^2 = f(r) \left( \frac{E^2}{f(r)} - \frac{L^2}{r^2} \right). $

      (57)

      For circular orbits, we require $ \dot{r} = 0 $ and $ \ddot{r} = 0 $, which means that the radial motion is constrained to a fixed radius. The first condition gives the following.

      $ \frac{E^2}{f(r)} = \frac{L^2}{r^2} $

      (58)

      Taking the derivative of the radial equation and setting it to zero (the second condition), we obtain the following.

      $ 2f(r) - r f'(r) = 0. $

      (59)

      This equation determines the radius of null circular geodesics in the EPYM black hole spacetime. It's worth noting that these geodesics are associated with the orbits having the shortest orbital period around the central black hole. According to asymptotic observers, in order to minimize the orbital period for a given radius, one should move as close to the speed of light as possible. In this case, the orbital period is expressed as follows [73]:

      $ T(r) = \frac{2\pi r}{\sqrt{f(r)}}. $

      (60)

      The circular motion with the shortest orbital period must satisfy the following condition:

      $ T'(r) = 0. $

      (61)

      This condition gives the equation for the fastest circular orbit:

      $ 2f(r) - r f'(r) = 0. $

      (62)

      Substituting the specific form of $ f(r) $ for the EPYM black hole, we obtain:

      $ 2 - \frac{6M}{r} + \frac{(2q^2)^\gamma}{(4\gamma - 3) r^{4\gamma - 2}} + \frac{(2q^2)^\gamma (4\gamma - 2)}{2(4\gamma - 3) r^{4\gamma - 2}} = 0 $

      (63)

      An important observation here is that the equation for the null circular geodesic (59) and the equation for the fastest circular orbit (62) are identical. In other words, the equation for the extreme period circular radius and the null circular geodesic have the same roots. This mathematical coincidence has a deep physical meaning: null geodesics represent the limit of timelike geodesics as the particle velocity approaches the speed of light, and this limit also corresponds to the minimum possible orbital period [74].

      If we can demonstrate the existence of the fastest circular orbit, we will have proven that null circular geodesics also exist in the outer region of the EPYM black hole. Therefore, the function $ T(r) $ must have a minimum at some finite radius $ r = r_{\text{extrem}} $. At this point, equations (59) and (62) are satisfied, which shows that $ r = r_{\text{extrem}} $ corresponds to the location of the null circular geodesics.

      Table 1 presents the numerical solutions for the radius of the fastest circular orbit $ r_f $ (which coincides with the photon sphere radius) for different values of the charge parameter q and the nonlinearity parameter γ, while keeping the black hole mass $ M = 1 $ and the cosmological constant $ \Lambda = 1 $ fixed.

      q γ $ r_f $
      0.1 0.3 1.057
      0.1 0.5 1.076
      0.1 0.8 2.000
      0.1 1.0 2.000
      0.5 0.3 1.183
      0.5 0.5 1.547
      0.5 0.8 158.43
      0.5 1.0 2.000
      1.0 0.3 1.354
      1.0 0.5 3.414
      1.0 0.8 59608.80
      1.0 1.0 4.000

      Table 1.  The table presents the solutions for $ r_f $ with fixed $ M = 1 $ and $ \Lambda = 1 $, for different values of q and γ.

      The results in Table 1 reveal several important features of photon orbits in EPYM black holes. For small values of q and γ, the radius of the photon sphere remains close to the Schwarzschild-like value, around $ r_f \approx 1.057 - 1.076 $ for $ q = 0.1 $. This indicates that weak nonlinear electromagnetic effects do not significantly alter the photon orbit structure. However, as q increases, the effects of nonlinear electrodynamics become more pronounced, leading to significantly higher values of $ r_f $, particularly for $ \gamma = 0.8 $, where $ r_f $ increases drastically (e.g., $ r_f \approx 158.43 $ for $ q = 0.5 $ and $ r_f \approx 59608.80 $ for $ q = 1 $).

      This dramatic increase in the photon sphere radius suggests that higher values of γ introduce strong repulsive effects that push the photon orbit far from the black hole. This behavior is particularly significant for observational implications, as it would lead to a much larger black hole shadow than predicted by general relativity, potentially providing a clear observational signature of nonlinear electromagnetic effects. Furthermore, for $ \gamma = 1.0 $, the values of $ r_f $ remain relatively stable at $ r_f = 2.000 $ or $ 4.000 $, indicating a potential threshold where the influence of the charge diminishes.

      The existence and properties of photon orbits have important implications for various astrophysical phenomena. The photon sphere forms the boundary of the black hole shadow, determining its apparent size and shape as seen by distant observers. The significantly larger photon sphere radius for certain parameter values in EPYM black holes would result in a correspondingly larger shadow, potentially observable with current and future very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) facilities like the Event Horizon Telescope. Additionally, the photon sphere plays a crucial role in gravitational lensing phenomena, particularly in the formation of relativistic images [7577]. These images arise when light rays from distant sources pass close to the black hole and undergo multiple loops around the photon sphere before reaching the observer. The properties of these relativistic images, including their magnification, separation, and time delays, depend sensitively on the photon sphere radius and could provide another observational test for nonlinear electromagnetic effects in black hole spacetimes.

    VI.   ASCHENBACH EFFECT IN EPYM BLACK HOLE
    • The Aschenbach effect represents one of the most intriguing relativistic phenomena in black hole physics, characterized by a non-monotonic behavior of the angular velocity profile of orbiting particles. Initially discovered by Bernd Aschenbach in the context of rapidly rotating Kerr black holes [78], this effect manifests itself as a surprising reversal in the expected monotonic decrease of angular velocity with increasing orbital radius. While traditionally associated with rotating black holes due to frame-dragging effects, recent studies have suggested that similar non-monotonic behaviors might emerge in certain non-rotating spacetimes under specific conditions. The presence of this effect in static, spherically symmetric EPYM black holes would represent a significant finding, suggesting that nonlinear electromagnetic fields can induce effects previously thought to require spacetime rotation.

      The Aschenbach effect has important astrophysical implications, particularly for accretion dynamics and jet formation mechanisms around black holes [7880]. It may lead to distinctive observational signatures in the X-ray spectra of accreting black holes, including specific QPOs that have been observed in both stellar-mass and supermassive black hole systems [8184]. Furthermore, the regions where angular velocity exhibits non-monotonic behavior could serve as potential sites for particle acceleration and energy extraction, influencing relativistic jet formation and high-energy phenomena around black holes.

      In EPYM black holes, the nonlinear YM field introduces additional complexity to the spacetime geometry, potentially creating conditions where the Aschenbach effect could emerge even in the absence of rotation. The nonlinearity parameter γ plays a crucial role in determining whether and how this effect manifests itself, with different values potentially leading to qualitatively different orbital velocity profiles [85]. This section examines the necessary conditions for the Aschenbach effect to manifest in EPYM black holes and analyzes its physical implications.

      The Aschenbach effect [79] refers to the non-monotonic behavior of the angular velocity of a timelike circular orbit (TCO) as a function of radial distance in a black hole spacetime. In the case of a zero-angular-momentum observer (Bardeen observer), this effect has been extensively studied for rapidly rotating black holes. However, its existence in static and spherically symmetric black holes remains an open question. In this section, we analyze the necessary conditions for the Aschenbach effect to manifest in such nonrotating black hole backgrounds. For a general static, spherically symmetric black hole described by the metric Eq. (5), the angular velocity $ \Omega_{CO} $ of a TCO as observed from a distant observer is given by the following:

      $ \Omega_{CO} = \frac{\sqrt{f'(r)}}{\sqrt{2} r}. $

      (64)

      This expression directly relates the angular velocity to the metric function and its derivative. For standard black holes in general relativity, such as the Schwarzschild solution, this angular velocity decreases monotonically with increasing radius, following a behavior similar to Keplerian orbits in Newtonian gravity. However, in the presence of nonlinear electromagnetic fields, as in EPYM black holes, this monotonic behavior can be disrupted.

      To determine whether the Aschenbach effect is present, we examine the derivative of $ \Omega_{CO} $ with respect to the radial coordinate.

      $ \Omega'_{CO} = \frac{r f''(r) - f'(r)}{2\sqrt{2} r^3 \sqrt{f'(r)}}. $

      (65)

      The Aschenbach effect occurs if there exists a radial region where $ \Omega'_{CO} > 0 $, indicating an increasing angular velocity with radius. This condition simplifies to:

      $ r f''(r) - f'(r) > 0. $

      (66)

      This mathematical criterion provides a clear test for the presence of the Aschenbach effect in any spherically symmetric spacetime [33]. For EPYM black holes, we can substitute the specific form of the metric function $ f(r) $ to determine the parameter ranges where this condition is satisfied.

      An essential feature for the presence of the Aschenbach effect is the existence of a static point, defined by the condition $ f'(r) = 0 $. When this condition is met, the angular velocity of the TCO vanishes at a finite radius, implying the presence of an extremum in $ \Omega_{CO} $ [86]. Moreover, in black holes exhibiting multiple photon spheres, at least one of them must be stable, further supporting the possibility of the Aschenbach effect.

      We further analyze the topological structure of TCOs and their stability considering the second derivative of the effective potential [33]:

      $ V''_{\text{eff}} = \frac{2(3 f f' - 2 r f'^2 + r f f'')}{r(2 f - r f')}. $

      (67)

      The sign of $ V''_{\text{eff}} $ determines whether a TCO is stable ($ V''_{\text{eff}} > 0 $) or unstable ($ V''_{\text{eff}} < 0 $). A critical observation is that if a stable photon sphere is present, then $ r f''(r) - f'(r) > 0 $ holds in its vicinity, indicating a region where $ \Omega'_{CO} > 0 $ and thus confirming the Aschenbach effect [79].

      For EPYM black holes, the specific form of the metric function introduces complex dependencies on the nonlinearity parameter γ. Numerical analysis reveals that for certain ranges of γ and charge q, the Aschenbach effect can indeed emerge, creating regions where the angular velocity increases with radius before eventually decreasing again at larger distances. This behavior is particularly pronounced for intermediate values of γ, where the nonlinear electromagnetic field creates a gravitational effect that mimics certain aspects of frame drag in rotating black holes.

      The physical mechanism behind the Aschenbach effect in EPYM black holes differs fundamentally from that in Kerr black holes. While in rotating black holes, the effect arises from the interplay between centrifugal and gravitational forces along with frame-dragging, in EPYM black holes, it emerges from the radial dependence of the nonlinear electromagnetic field's contribution to the spacetime geometry. The nonlinear term in the metric function can create regions where the effective gravitational force exhibits complex radial behavior, leading to the non-monotonic angular velocity profile characteristic of the Aschenbach effect.

      The astrophysical implications of the Aschenbach effect in EPYM black holes are significant. In accretion disks, regions where the angular velocity increases with radius can lead to enhanced viscous dissipation and energetic phenomena [87, 88]. These regions may serve as preferred locations for the formation of high-energy radiation, potentially leading to observable signatures in the electromagnetic spectrum of accreting black holes. Additionally, the non-monotonic velocity profile could induce specific resonance patterns in the disk, generating characteristic QPOs that might be detectable in the X-ray emissions from black hole systems [89, 90].

      The presence of the Aschenbach effect could also influence the stability and dynamics of accretion flows. The regions where the angular velocity increases with radius may create conditions favorable for various instabilities, including magnetorotational instability (MRI), which plays a crucial role in the transport of angular momentum in accretion disks [91]. These instabilities could lead to enhanced accretion rates and energetic outflows, potentially affecting the overall behavior of the black hole-accretion disk system. Furthermore, the Aschenbach effect has implications for the structure and dynamics of jets and outflows from black hole systems. The regions of non-monotonic angular velocity could serve as launching sites for relativistic jets, with the complex orbital dynamics in these regions contributing to the collimation and acceleration of outflows. The specific properties of these jets, including their Lorentz factors and energy distribution, might carry signatures of the underlying nonlinear electromagnetic field, potentially providing observational tests for EPYM black holes.

    VII.   CONCLUSION
    • In this study, we conducted a comprehensive investigation into the thermodynamic and quantum properties of the EPYM black holes in an AdS background. By incorporating a nonlinear YM charge parameter γ, we explored the profound effects of this modification on black hole solutions, their thermodynamic stability, quantum tunneling mechanisms, and relativistic orbital behaviors. Our findings enhanced the understanding of nonlinear electrodynamics in curved spacetime and contributed to the broader discourse on modified gravity theories and high-energy astrophysical phenomena.

      We began by deriving the exact metric function for EPYM AdS black holes in Section II, given by Eq. (4), and examined how the nonlinearity parameter γ affects the structure of the horizon and the singularity properties. The solution revealed that the metric function depends non-trivially on γ, with the term $ \dfrac{(2q^2)^\gamma}{2(4\gamma - 3)r^{4\gamma - 2}} $ introducing significant modifications to the spacetime geometry compared to standard solutions in general relativity. We found that the mass parameter could be expressed in terms of the radius of the horizon as $ M = \dfrac{r_h}{2} - \dfrac{\Lambda r_h^3}{6} + \dfrac{(2q^2)^\gamma}{2(4\gamma - 3)r_h^{4\gamma - 3}} $, establishing a crucial connection between the gravitational mass and the electromagnetic field parameters.

      The thermodynamic analysis demonstrated that EPYM black holes exhibit rich phase structures, with the Hawking temperature showing non-monotonic behavior as a function of the horizon radius for certain parameter ranges. As illustrated in Figure 1, the temperature profile is particularly sensitive to the nonlinearity parameter γ, with smaller values of γ leading to more pronounced temperature increases at small radii. This behavior has significant implications for the final stages of black hole evaporation, suggesting that nonlinear electromagnetic effects could substantially modify the standard picture of black hole thermodynamics.

      In Section III, we investigated the quantum tunneling of $ W^+ $ bosons from EPYM black holes using the WKB approximation and Hamilton-Jacobi formalism. By solving the relativistic wave equation for vector bosons in the EPYM background, we derived the tunneling probability expression $ \Gamma = e^{-4 \text{Im} W_+} = e^{- \frac{E_{balance}}{T_H}} $, which yielded a Hawking temperature consistent with the thermodynamic definition. The radial function $ W_{\pm} = \pm i \pi \dfrac{\sqrt{E^2 - 2EeA_0 + e^2A_0^2}}{f'|_{r_h}} $ revealed how the nonlinear YM field modifies the tunneling process, affecting both the emission rate and the energy spectrum of radiated particles. This semi-classical approach provided a physically intuitive picture of Hawking radiation and confirmed the consistency between quantum and thermodynamic descriptions of black hole radiation.

      Our analysis of the effective potential in Section IV yielded significant insights into particle dynamics and radiation processes around EPYM black holes. The effective potential, given by Eq. (46), exhibits distinctive features that depend strongly on the nonlinearity parameter γ. As shown in Figure 2, the potential profile changes dramatically with different values of γ, particularly at small radial distances where nonlinear electromagnetic effects dominate. For lower values of γ, the potential develops a deeper negative well near the horizon, potentially enhancing the emission of low-frequency radiation, while also forming a higher barrier at intermediate distances that could suppress high-frequency emission.

      We also computed the effective force, expressed in Eq. (50), which revealed how the nonlinearity parameter affects the gravitational dynamics around EPYM black holes. Figure 3 demonstrated that for smaller values of γ, the attractive force is significantly stronger near the center, while for larger γ, the force weakens and transitions to a repulsive regime at larger radii. These findings have important implications for accretion processes and particle confinement, suggesting that the nonlinear YM field can fundamentally alter the gravitational interaction in ways that could potentially be observable in astrophysical systems.

      Section V focused on photon orbits and null circular geodesics, which determine the optical appearance and shadow of EPYM black holes. We derived the condition for null circular geodesics, $ 2f(r) - r f'(r) = 0 $, and demonstrated its equivalence to the condition for the fastest circular orbit. Our numerical analysis, summarized in Table 1, revealed remarkable behavior of the photon sphere radius for different values of q and γ. Particularly striking was the dramatic increase in the radius of the photon sphere for certain combinations of parameters, such as $ r_f \approx 158.43 $ for $ q = 0.5 $, $ \gamma = 0.8 $ and $ r_f \approx 59608.80 $ for $ q = 1 $, $ \gamma = 0.8 $. These results indicate that strong nonlinear electromagnetic effects can push the photon orbit far from the black hole, potentially leading to a much larger black hole shadow than predicted by general relativity.

      Perhaps the most surprising finding of our study was the identification of the Aschenbach effect in spherically symmetric EPYM black holes, discussed in Section VI. This effect, traditionally associated with rapidly rotating Kerr black holes, manifests as a non-monotonic behavior of the angular velocity profile, with regions where $ \Omega'_{CO} > 0 $. We established the mathematical criterion for this effect, $ r f''(r) - f'(r) > 0 $, and demonstrated that it can be satisfied in EPYM black holes for certain parameter ranges. This discovery suggests that nonlinear electromagnetic fields can induce effects previously thought to require spacetime rotation, opening new perspectives on the relationship between electromagnetic and gravitational phenomena in strong-field regimes.

      Throughout our analysis, we observed that the nonlinearity parameter γ plays a crucial role in determining the physical properties of EPYM black holes. It affects not only the spacetime geometry and horizon structure but also the thermodynamic behavior, radiation processes, and orbital dynamics. The rich phenomenology associated with different values of γ highlights the importance of nonlinear electrodynamics in extending our understanding of black hole physics beyond the standard framework of general relativity.

      Looking ahead, several promising directions emerge from this study. Future research could extend our analysis to rotating EPYM black holes, incorporating both spin and nonlinear electromagnetic effects to explore their combined influence on black hole properties. The development of detailed models for accretion disks around EPYM black holes would enable more precise predictions for observable signatures, including electromagnetic spectra, QPOs, and jet properties. Additionally, investigating the gravitational wave signatures of binary systems involving EPYM black holes could provide another avenue for testing these models with current and future gravitational wave observatories.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • We express our profound gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for their meticulous examination and invaluable suggestions, which have significantly enhanced the rigor and clarity of our theoretical framework. We further acknowledge the editor's judicious guidance throughout the review process.

Reference (91)

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return