Erratum: Improvement of nuclear semi-empirical mass formula by including shell effect (Chin. Phys. C, 49(11): 114103 (2025))

This paper was published online on 28 June 2025, and there is a numerical error in Fig. 1 of the published version. This correction only resulted in minor changes to the last decimal places of the root mean square (rms) deviation of the BWK formula, and through rigorous verification, such discrepancies will not have any impact on the key conclusions of the paper. The Fig. 1 in the published version is corrected as Fig. 1 in this erratum.

Figure 1.  Differences between the experimental binding energies and predictions calculated using the BWK* and BWK formulas, respectively. The dashed lines denote the traditional magic numbers.

This paper was published online on 28 June 2025, and there is a numerical error in Fig. 1 of the published version. This correction only resulted in minor changes to the last decimal places of the root mean square (rms) deviation of the BWK formula, and through rigorous verification, such discrepancies will not have any impact on the key conclusions of the paper. The Fig. 1 in the published version is corrected as Fig. 1 in this erratum.

Figure 1.  Differences between the experimental binding energies and predictions calculated using the BWK* and BWK formulas, respectively. The dashed lines denote the traditional magic numbers.

This paper was published online on 28 June 2025, and there is a numerical error in Fig. 1 of the published version. This correction only resulted in minor changes to the last decimal places of the root mean square (rms) deviation of the BWK formula, and through rigorous verification, such discrepancies will not have any impact on the key conclusions of the paper. The Fig. 1 in the published version is corrected as Fig. 1 in this erratum.

Figure 1.  Differences between the experimental binding energies and predictions calculated using the BWK* and BWK formulas, respectively. The dashed lines denote the traditional magic numbers.

This paper was published online on 28 June 2025, and there is a numerical error in Fig. 1 of the published version. This correction only resulted in minor changes to the last decimal places of the root mean square (rms) deviation of the BWK formula, and through rigorous verification, such discrepancies will not have any impact on the key conclusions of the paper. The Fig. 1 in the published version is corrected as Fig. 1 in this erratum.

Figure 1.  Differences between the experimental binding energies and predictions calculated using the BWK* and BWK formulas, respectively. The dashed lines denote the traditional magic numbers.