New behaviors of α-particle preformation factors near doubly magic 100Sn

Figures(3) / Tables(2)

Get Citation
Jun-Gang Deng, Hong-Fei Zhang and Xiao-Dong Sun. New behaviors of α-particle preformation factors near doubly magic 100Sn[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac5a9f
Jun-Gang Deng, Hong-Fei Zhang and Xiao-Dong Sun. New behaviors of α-particle preformation factors near doubly magic 100Sn[J]. Chinese Physics C.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac5a9f shu
Milestone
Received: 2021-12-06
Article Metric

Article Views(1001)
PDF Downloads(78)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

New behaviors of α-particle preformation factors near doubly magic 100Sn

    Corresponding author: Hong-Fei Zhang, zhanghf@xjtu.edu.cn
  • 1. School of Physics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
  • 2. School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • 3. China Nuclear Data Center, China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, China

Abstract: The $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors of nuclei above doubly magic nuclei $ ^{100} $Sn and $ ^{208} $Pb are investigated within the generalized liquid drop model. The results show that the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors of nuclei near self-conjugate doubly magic $ ^{100} $Sn are significantly larger than those of analogous nuclei just above $ ^{208} $Pb, and they will be enhanced as the nuclei move towards the $ N = Z $ line. The proton–neutron correlation energy $ E_{p-n} $ and two protons–two neutrons correlation energy $ E_{2p-2n} $ of nuclei near $ ^{100} $Sn also exhibit a similar situation, indicating that the interactions between protons and neutrons occupying similar single-particle orbitals could enhance the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors and result in superallowed $ \alpha $ decay. This also provides evidence of the significant role of the proton–neutron interaction on $ \alpha $-particle preformation. Also, the linear relationship between $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors and the product of valence protons and valence neutrons for nuclei around $ ^{208} $Pb is broken in the $ ^{100} $Sn region because the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factor is enhanced when a nucleus near $ ^{100} $Sn moves towards the $ N = Z $ line. Furthermore, the calculated $ \alpha $ decay half-lives fit well with the experimental data, including the recent observed self-conjugate nuclei $ ^{104} $Te and $ ^{108} $Xe [Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 182501 (2018)].

    HTML

  • $ \alpha $ decay is a fundamental nuclear decay mode. Research on $ \alpha $ decay has long been focused in the vicinities of doubly magic nuclei $ ^{208} $Pb ($ Z = 82,\; N = 126 $) and $ ^{298} $Fl ($ Z = 114, \;N = 184 $) because $ \alpha $ decay can be a probe to study unstable nucleus structures, and can be the only way to identify new synthesized superheavy nuclei [127]. Over the past two decades, $ \alpha $ emitters around the self-conjugate doubly magic nucleus $ ^{100} $Sn ($ Z = N = 50 $) at the opposite end of the mass table have also received a lot of attention and become a hot topic in nuclear physics [18, 2835]. In particular, there is the fastest $ \alpha $ emitter $ ^{104} $Te near doubly magic nucleus $ ^{100} $Sn [34]. Since the $ \alpha $ emitters near self-conjugate doubly magic nucleus $ ^{100} $Sn are close to the $ N = Z $ line, the nuclear force is extremely sensitive to isospin. Therefore, it is a great chance to study the unique neutron-deficient nuclear structure and examine various $ \alpha $ decay theoretical models. Moreover, cluster radioactivity was also predicted as one of the decay modes of nuclei in the $ ^{100} $Sn region [3639]. Further interest in the decay rates of nuclei around doubly magic nucleus $ ^{100} $Sn comes from research into astrophysical processes, for which this region has been considered as the end of the rapid proton capture process due to the Sn–Sb–Te cycle [33, 40, 41].

    In addition, in the neutron-deficient Te, Xe, and Ba isotopes near $ ^{100} $Sn, one would expect that interactions between protons and neutrons occupying similar single-particle orbitals could enhance the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors, and together with the significantly reduced $ \alpha $-widths compared to the analogous nuclei just above doubly magic nucleus $ ^{208} $Pb, can result in the so-called "superallowed" $ \alpha $ decay [42]. This effect would be expected to be strongest for $ N = Z $ self-conjugate nuclei [42]. Recently, $ \alpha $ radioactivity to a heavy self-conjugate nucleus was observed for the first time on the $ ^{108} $Xe$ \to $$ ^{104} $Te$ \to $$ ^{100} $Sn $ \alpha $ decay chain [34], including the measurements of the $ \alpha $-particle kinetic energy and $ \alpha $ decay half-lives of the $ \alpha $ emitters $ ^{108} $Xe [$ E_{\alpha} = 4.4(2) $ MeV, $ T_{1/2} = 58^{+106}_{-23} $ μs] and $ ^{104} $Te [$ E_{\alpha} = 4.9(2) $ MeV, $ T_{1/2}<18 $ ns]. The authors of this article suggested that the $ \alpha $-reduced width for $ ^{108} $Xe or $ ^{104} $Te is more than a factor of 5 larger than that for $ ^{212} $Po [34].

    It is well known that $ ^{104} $Te, near the proton drip line, and $ ^{212} $Po, near the $ \mathcal{\beta}- $stability line, are the only two existing $ \alpha $ emitters decaying to doubly magic nuclei. In recent years, researchers adopted different models such as the density dependent cluster model (DDCM) [28, 4345], the generalized liquid drop model (GLDM) [46, 47], the preformed cluster model (PCM) [48], etc. to study the $ \alpha $ decay of nuclei around doubly magic $ ^{208} $Pb and $ ^{100} $Sn, and provide some important insights on the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factor. In this letter, we focus on the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors of nuclei near self-conjugate doubly magic nucleus $ ^{100} $Sn, and compare them to those of analogous nuclei just above the doubly magic nucleus $ ^{208} $Pb, based on the available experimental data of $ \alpha $ decay [34, 4959] within the generalized liquid drop model (GLDM) [6066]. These $ \alpha $ emitters have different isospins and mass numbers as well as different proton and neutron closed shells. We want to reveal some new behaviors of $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors for extremely neutron-deficient nuclei near self-conjugate doubly magic nucleus $ ^{100} $Sn, in order to understand the roles of proton–neutron correlation and the single-particle orbitals occupied by protons and neutrons in the preformation of $ \alpha $-clusters, as well as the physical mechanism of superallowed $ \alpha $ decay.

    The GLDM can deal well with proton radioactivity [67], cluster radioactivity [68], fusion [69], fission [70], and the $ \alpha $ decay process [22, 6066, 71] by introducing the quasimolecular shape mechanism [60], which can describe the complex deformation process from the parent nucleus through continuous transition to the appearance of a deep and narrow neck, finally resulting in two tangential fragments, and adding the proximity energy, including an accurate radius and mass asymmetry. In previous works [6066], the GLDM has been introduced in detail. The $ \alpha $ decay half-life can be obtained by

    $ T_{1/2} = \frac{\ln{2}}{\lambda} , $

    (1)

    with the $ \alpha $ decay constant $ \mathcal{\lambda} $ being expressed as

    $ \begin{array}{l} \ \lambda = P_{\alpha}{\nu}P , \end{array} $

    (2)

    where the assault frequency $ \mathcal{\nu} $ is obtained using the classical method with the kinetic energy of the $ \alpha $-particle. The barrier-penetrating probability $ P $ is determined by tunneling the GLDM potential barriers [6066] with the Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin (WKB) approximation.

    The experimental $ \alpha $-particle preformation factor $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ can be extracted from the ratios of the theoretical decay half-life $ T_{1/2}^{\rm{Cal1}} $, calculated by assuming the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factor is a constant $ P_{\alpha} = 1 $, to experimental decay half-life [65, 7275]. This is expressed as

    $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} = \frac{T_{1/2}^{\rm{Cal1}}}{T_{1/2}^{\rm{Exp}}} . $

    (3)

    To examine the experimental $ \alpha $ decay half-life data, the analytic formula for estimating the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factor is also adopted, which was put forward in our previous works [66, 71]. It is expressed as

    $ \begin{aligned}[b] \log_{10}P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Eq}} =& a+bA^{1/6}\sqrt{Z}+c\frac{Z}{\sqrt{Q_{\alpha}}}-d\chi^{\prime}\\&-e\rho^{\prime}+f\sqrt{l(l+1)} , \end{aligned} $

    (4)

    where

    $ \chi^{\prime} = Z_1Z_2\sqrt{\dfrac{A_1A_2}{(A_1+A_2)Q_{\alpha}}} $

    and

    $\rho^{\prime} = \sqrt{\dfrac{A_1A_2}{A_1+A_2}Z_1Z_2\left(A_1^{1/3}+A_2^{1/3}\right)}. $

    $ A $, $ Z $, and $ Q_{\alpha} $ represent mass number, proton number, and $ \alpha $ decay energy of the parent nucleus. $ A_1 $, $ Z_1 $, $ A_2 $, and $ Z_2 $ denote the mass and proton numbers of the $ \alpha $-particle and daughter nucleus. $ l $ is the angular momentum carried by the $ \alpha $-particle. The parameters values are listed in Ref. [66].

    The calculated $ \alpha $ decay half-lives for nuclei above doubly magic nuclei $ ^{100} $Sn and $ ^{208} $Pb are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. In these two tables, the first four columns represent the $ \alpha $ transition, the experimental kinetic energy of the $ \alpha $-particle, the experimental $ \alpha $ decay energy, and the minimum angular momentum carried by the $ \alpha $-particle. The fifth column is the experimental $ \alpha $ decay half-life. The sixth column denotes the calculated $ \alpha $ decay half-life $ T_{1/2}^{\rm{Cal1}} $ within the GLDM with $ P_{\alpha} = 1 $. The seventh column gives the calculated $ \alpha $ decay half-life $ T_{1/2}^{\rm{Cal2}} $ within the GLDM with the estimated $ \alpha $-particle preformation factor from Eq. (4). The eighth column shows the extracted experimental $ \alpha $-particle preformation factor by using Eq. (3) with $ T^{\rm{Cal1}}_{1/2} $ and $ T^{\rm{Exp}}_{1/2} $. The last two columns express the calculated proton–neutron correlation energy $ E_{p-n} $ and two protons–two neutrons correlation energy $ E_{2p-2n} $ determined by Eqs. (6) and (7). From these two tables, it can be seen immediately that the calculated $ \alpha $ decay half-lives $ T_{1/2}^{\rm{Cal2}} $ can accurately reproduce the experimental data including the newly observed self-conjugate nuclei $ ^{104} $Te and $ ^{108} $Xe [34]. Note that the calculations provide support for recent experimental observation data in Ref. [34]. In Table 1, for $ ^{110} $Te, the calculated $ \alpha $-particle preformation factor using Eq. (4) is an order of magnitude larger than the extracted value from the experimental $ \alpha $ decay half-life data. This is because the $ \alpha $ decay branch ratio of $ ^{110} $Te is very small, only 0.00067% [28], and the microscopic calculation of the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factor is very complicated, while Eq. (4) mainly considers the $ \alpha $ decay energy, proton number, and mass number when calculating the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factor. This leads to a deviation between the theoretically calculated $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors and the experimental data for nuclei with extremely low $ \alpha $ decay branch ratios such as $ ^{110} $Te.

    $ \alpha $ transition$ E_{\alpha} $
    /MeV
    $ Q_{\alpha} $
    /MeV
    $ l_{\rm min} $$ T^{\rm{Exp}}_{1/2} $
    /s
    $ {T_{1/2}^{\rm{Cal1}}} $
    /s
    $ {T_{1/2}^{\rm{Cal2}}} $
    /s
    $ {P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}}} $$ E_{p-n} $
    /MeV
    $ E_{2p-2n} $
    /MeV
    $ ^{104} $Te$ \to^{100} $Sn4.9
    [34]
    5.10$<1.80\times10^{-8} $
    [34]
    $ 1.47\times10^{-8} $$ 7.29\times10^{-8} $$>0.81 $1.26$ {^a} $3.64$ {^a} $
    $ ^{106} $Te$ \to^{102} $Sn4.128
    [51]
    4.290$ 7.00\times10^{-5} $
    [5052]
    $ 2.52\times10^{-5} $$ 8.38\times10^{-5} $0.360.56$ {^b} $1.84$ {^a} $
    $ ^{108} $Te$ \to^{104} $Sn3.314
    [54]
    3.440$ 4.30\times10^{0} $
    [51, 53, 54]
    $ 9.30\times10^{-1} $$ 1.68\times10^{0} $0.221.06$ {^b} $1.83$ {^b} $
    $ ^{110} $Te$ \to^{106} $Sn2.624
    [55]
    2.720$ 2.78\times10^{6} $
    [55, 56]
    $ 3.32\times10^{5} $$ 2.87\times10^{5} $0.120.71$ {^b} $1.73$ {^b} $
    $ ^{108} $Xe$ \to^{104} $Te4.32
    [34, 49]
    4.490$ 5.80\times10^{-5} $
    [34]
    $ 3.70\times10^{-5} $$ 1.10\times10^{-4} $0.641.10$ {^a} $3.35$ {^a} $
    $ ^{110} $Xe$ \to^{106} $Te3.72
    [50]
    3.860$ 1.48\times10^{-1} $
    [50]
    $ 5.00\times10^{-2} $$ 1.07\times10^{-1} $0.340.73$ {^b} $2.02$ {^a} $
    $ ^{112} $Xe$ \to^{108} $Te3.216
    [51]
    3.340$ 3.38\times10^{2} $
    [51, 53]
    $ 1.01\times10^{2} $$ 1.53\times10^{2} $0.301.13$ {^b} $1.66$ {^b} $
    $ ^{114} $Ba$ \to^{110} $Xe3.48
    [50]
    3.610$ 4.20\times10^{1} $
    [50]
    $ 2.60\times10^{1} $$ 4.19\times10^{1} $0.620.66$ {^b} $1.96$ {^a} $
    a Calculated by using nuclear mass data in the WS4+ mass model [76].
    b Calculated using nuclear mass data in the evaluated atomic mass table AME2016 [58, 59].

    Table 1.  Calculations of $ \alpha $-particle preformation factor, $ \alpha $ decay half-lives, and the proton–neutron correlation energy $ E_{p-n} $ and two protons–two neutrons correlation energy $ E_{2p-2n} $ of even–even Te, Xe, and Ba isotopes near $ ^{100} $Sn.

    $ \alpha $ transition$ E_{\alpha} $
    /MeV
    $ Q_{\alpha} $
    /MeV
    $ l_{\rm min} $$ T^{\rm{Exp}}_{1/2} $
    /s
    $ {T_{1/2}^{\rm{Cal1}}} $
    /s
    $ {T_{1/2}^{\rm{Cal2}}} $
    /s
    $ {P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}}} $$ E_{p-n} $
    /MeV
    $ E_{2p-2n} $
    /MeV
    $ ^{212} $Po$ \to^{208} $Pb8.798.950$ 2.95\times10^{-7} $$ 1.00\times10^{-8} $$ 1.48\times10^{-7} $0.030.871.44
    $ ^{214} $Po$ \to^{210} $Pb7.697.830$ 1.64\times10^{-4} $$ 1.14\times10^{-5} $$ 1.23\times10^{-4} $0.070.701.28
    $ ^{216} $Po$ \to^{212} $Pb6.786.910$ 1.45\times10^{-1} $$ 1.39\times10^{-2} $$ 1.09\times10^{-1} $0.100.511.11
    $ ^{218} $Po$ \to^{214} $Pb6.006.120$ 1.86\times10^{2} $$ 1.93\times10^{1} $$ 1.09\times10^{2} $0.100.381.09
    $ ^{212} $Rn$ \to^{208} $Po6.266.380$ 1.43\times10^{3} $$ 1.40\times10^{1} $$ 6.86\times10^{2} $0.010.230.57
    $ ^{214} $Rn$ \to^{210} $Po9.049.210$ 2.70\times10^{-7} $$ 1.08\times10^{-8} $$ 1.85\times10^{-7} $0.040.671.24
    $ ^{216} $Rn$ \to^{212} $Po8.058.200$ 4.50\times10^{-5} $$ 4.99\times10^{-6} $$ 6.56\times10^{-5} $0.110.701.33
    $ ^{218} $Rn$ \to^{214} $Po7.137.260$ 3.38\times10^{-2} $$ 4.23\times10^{-3} $$ 4.15\times10^{-2} $0.130.581.29
    $ ^{220} $Rn$ \to^{216} $Po6.296.410$ 5.56\times10^{1} $$ 8.33\times10^{0} $$ 5.92\times10^{1} $0.150.521.18
    $ ^{222} $Rn$ \to^{218} $Po5.495.590$ 3.30\times10^{5} $$ 5.71\times10^{4} $$ 2.79\times10^{5} $0.170.511.15
    $ ^{214} $Ra$ \to^{210} $Rn7.147.270$ 2.44\times10^{0} $$ 3.25\times10^{-2} $$ 1.53\times10^{0} $0.010.220.65
    $ ^{216} $Ra$ \to^{212} $Rn9.359.530$ 1.82\times10^{-7} $$ 8.41\times10^{-9} $$ 1.70\times10^{-7} $0.050.521.14
    $ ^{218} $Ra$ \to^{214} $Rn8.398.550$ 2.52\times10^{-5} $$ 2.44\times10^{-6} $$ 3.88\times10^{-5} $0.100.581.21
    $ ^{220} $Ra$ \to^{216} $Rn7.457.590$ 1.79\times10^{-2} $$ 1.93\times10^{-3} $$ 2.34\times10^{-2} $0.110.681.35
    $ ^{222} $Ra$ \to^{218} $Rn6.566.680$ 3.36\times10^{1} $$ 4.46\times10^{0} $$ 3.92\times10^{1} $0.130.441.34
    $ ^{224} $Ra$ \to^{220} $Rn5.695.790$ 3.14\times10^{5} $$ 4.97\times10^{4} $$ 2.99\times10^{5} $0.160.411.25
    $ ^{226} $Ra$ \to^{222} $Rn4.784.870$ 5.05\times10^{10} $$ 1.10\times10^{10} $$ 4.00\times10^{10} $0.220.401.23

    Table 2.  Same as Table 1, but for even–even Po, Rn, and Ra isotopes near $ ^{208} $Pb. The experimental $ \alpha $ decay half-lives are taken from the evaluated nuclear properties table NUBASE2016 [57]. The experimental $ \alpha $ decay energy are taken from the evaluated atomic mass table AME2016 [58, 59]. The $ E_{p-n} $ and $ E_{2p-2n} $ energies are calculated using the nuclear mass data in the AME2016 [58, 59].

    To measure the agreement between the calculated $ \alpha $ decay half-lives $ T^{\rm{Cal2}}_{1/2} $ and experimental data $ T^{\rm{Exp}}_{1/2} $, the standard deviations are calculated by

    $ \begin{array}{l} \sigma = \sqrt{\frac{1}{n}\sum ({\log_{10}T_{1/2}^{\rm{Cal2}}-\log_{10}T_{1/2}^{\rm{Exp}}})^2} . \end{array} $

    (5)

    For nuclei in Tables 1 and 2, the results of standard deviations $ \sigma_1 = 0.47 $ and $ \sigma_2 = 0.16 $ are satisfactory, showing that $ T^{\rm{Cal2}}_{1/2} $ can accurately reproduce $ T^{\rm{Exp}}_{1/2} $ within factors of $ 10^{0.47} = 2.95 $ and $ 10^{0.16} = 1.45 $, respectively. This demonstrates that the GLDM can be applied to extract the experimental $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors for studying the structure information of nuclei in these two regions.

    Furthermore, Tables 1 and 2 show that the extracted experimental $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ of nuclei near $ ^{100} $Sn are larger than $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ of nuclei near $ ^{208} $Pb, and in particular, larger than $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ of analogous nuclei just above $ ^{208} $Pb. The analogous nuclei refer to the two nuclei with the same valence proton and valence neutron located above doubly magic cores $ ^{100} $Sn and $ ^{208} $Pb, respectively. The valence protons $ N_p $ and valence neutrons $ N_n $ are defined as $ N_p = Z-Z_0 $ and $ N_n = N-N_0 $ with $ Z_0 = 50 $ and 82, $ N_0 = 50 $ and 126, being the magic numbers of protons and neutrons in the corresponding nuclear region. For example, $ ^{104} $Te is analogous to $ ^{212} $Po because they both have two valence protons and two valence neutrons outside of the doubly magic nuclei $ ^{100} $Sn and $ ^{208} $Pb, respectively.

    The extracted experimental $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ for nuclei above $ ^{100} $Sn and for analogous nuclei just above $ ^{208} $Pb are shown as functions of valence protons and valence neutrons in Fig. 1 (a), (b), and (c), respectively. In this figure, one can see that $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ for nuclei above $ ^{100} $Sn are significantly larger than those of analogous nuclei just above $ ^{208} $Pb. Furthermore, Fig. 1 (a) shows the variations of $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ for Te ($ Z = 52 $) and Po ($ Z = 84 $) isotopes, whose valence protons are $ N_p = $$ Z-Z_0 = 2 $, against valence neutrons $ N_n $. It is clear that for Te isotopes $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ exhibits an increasing trend when the nucleus moves towards the $ N = Z $ line, but Po isotopes do not show similar patterns due to the large asymmetry between neutrons and protons. Figure 1 (b) displays the variations of $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ for Xe ($ Z = 54 $) and Rn ($ Z = 86 $) isotopes, whose valence protons are $ N_p = Z-Z_0 = 4 $, against valence neutrons $ N_n $. We find that for Xe isotopes $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ also increases as the nucleus moves towards the $ N = Z $ line. However, Rn isotopes still do not show a similar trend of change. Figure 1 (c) plots $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ as a function of valence protons $ N_p $ for $ N = 58 $ and $ N = 134 $ isotones, whose valence neutrons are $ N_n = N-N_0 = 8 $. $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ for $ N = 58 $ isotopes also show an increasing tendency as the nuclei move towards the $ N = Z $ line, but this phenomenon does not occur in the analogous $ N = 134 $ isotopes just above $ ^{208} $Pb. This indicated that $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ is enhanced when a nucleus moves towards the $ N = Z $ line, resulting in the superallowed $ \alpha $ decay near doubly magic nucleus $ ^{100} $Sn. In recent work, Clark et al. adopted a very different model and studied the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors of nuclei in these two regions [31]. A similar conclusion was obtained, though the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors of nuclei near doubly magic nuclei $ ^{100} $Sn and $ ^{208} $Pb are in orders of $ 10^{-2} $ and $ 10^{-3} $, respectively.

    Figure 1.  (color online) Variations of extracted experimental $\alpha$-particle preformation factors $P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}}$ from Eq. (3) against the valence neutrons for $Z = 52$ and $Z = 84$ isotopes (left), and against the valence neutrons for $Z = 54$ and $Z = 86$ isotopes (middle), and against the valence protons for $N = 58$ and $N = 134$ isotones (right), respectively.

    To investigate the effects of the proton–neutron interaction and the two protons–two neutrons interaction on $ \alpha $-particle preformation, we calculate the proton–neutron correlation energy $ E_{p-n} $ and two protons–two neutrons correlation energy $ E_{2p-2n} $ using

    $ \begin{aligned}[b] E_{p-n} =& B(A, Z)+B(A-2, Z-1)\\&-B(A-1, Z-1)-B(A-1, Z) , \end{aligned} $

    (6)

    $ \begin{aligned}[b] E_{2p-2n} =& B(A, Z)+B(A-4, Z-2)\\&-B(A-2, Z-2)-B(A-2, Z) . \end{aligned} $

    (7)

    Equations (6) and (7) were proposed in Ref. [77] and used to determine the experimental pairing energy of the nucleons [78]. $ B(A, Z) $ is the binding energy of a nucleus with the mass number $ A $ and proton number $ Z $. The results of $ E_{p-n} $ energy and $ E_{2p-2n} $ energy are listed in the last two columns of Tables 1 and 2. In these two tables, it can be found that the $ E_{p-n} $ and $ E_{2p-2n} $ energies of nuclei above doubly magic nucleus $ ^{100} $Sn are larger than those of analogous nuclei just above $ ^{208} $Pb. This, in turn, leads to significant enhancement of $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ for nuclei near $ ^{100} $Sn. The results for the $ E_{p-n} $ and $ E_{2p-2n} $ energies are plotted in Fig. 2. In this figure, the $ E_{p-n} $ and $ E_{2p-2n} $ energies of nuclei above $ ^{100} $Sn are strengthened when compared to analogous nuclei just above $ ^{208} $Pb. For $ Z = 52 $ isotopes, the $ E_{p-n} $ and $ E_{2p-2n} $ energies increase rapidly in $ N_n = 2 $. Similarly, for $ Z = 54 $ isotopes, the $ E_{p-n} $ and $ E_{2p-2n} $ energies rise fast in $ N_n = 4 $. However, the $ E_{p-n} $ and $ E_{2p-2n} $ energies of analogous nuclei just above $ ^{208} $Pb change slowly. Therefore, it is demonstrated that the $ \alpha $-particle is more likely to form in self-conjugate nuclei, resulting in the superallowed $ \alpha $ decay. In addition, the $ E_{2p-2n} $ energy appears an increased tendency, the same as $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $, when the nucleus moves towards the $ N = Z $ line, implying that the two protons–two neutrons interaction plays a more significant role than one proton–one neutron interaction in $ \alpha $-particle preformation.

    Figure 2.  (color online) Proton–neutron $E_{p-n}$ correlation energy and two protons–two neutrons correlation energy $E_{2p-2n}$ for nuclei above $^{100}$Sn (denoted as solid symbols) and analogous nuclei above $^{208}$Pb (denoted as open symbols).

    The extracted experimental $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ for nuclei above $ ^{100} $Sn and $ ^{208} $Pb are shown as functions of $ ({N_pN_n})/({Z_0+N_0}) $ in Fig. 3 (a) and (b), respectively. In Fig. 3 (b), one can see that the closer $ ({N_pN_n})/({Z_0+N_0}) $ is to zero, representing the proton and/or neutron numbers approaching closed shells, the smaller is $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $. When $ ({N_pN_n})/({Z_0+N_0}) $ is far from zero, $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ will increase. This indicates that the closer the proton and/or neutron number is to the magic number, the more difficult it is for an $ \alpha $-particle to form inside its parent nucleus. We find that $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ is linearly dependent on $ ({N_pN_n})/({Z_0+N_0}) $ for nuclei above $ ^{208} $Pb. This is consistent with the conclusions deduced by adopting different models, in which the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors are extracted from the ratios between theoretical $ \alpha $ decay half-lives calculated by adopting the different models to experimental data [15, 79, 80], or calculated using the differences of binding energy between the $ \alpha $ decaying parent nucleus and its neighboring nuclei within the cluster-formation model [81]. It is shown that the nuclear shell effects and the nucleon configurations play key roles in $ \alpha $-cluster preformation for $ \alpha $-particle emitters around doubly magic $ ^{208} $Pb. However, in Fig. 3 (a) this phenomenon is broken in the $ ^{100} $Sn region. The values of $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ for nuclei above $ ^{100} $Sn are linearly independent of $ ({N_pN_n})/({Z_0+N_0} )$ and show a new behavior. When the nucleus is close to shell closure, $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ for nuclei near $ ^{100} $Sn does not decrease like that for nuclei near $ ^{208} $Pb, but rather increases. In addition, we can find that the maximum values of $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ in Fig. 3 (a) correspond to $ ^{104} $Te, $ ^{108} $Xe, and $ ^{114} $Ba. In particular, $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ is significantly enhanced along the N = Z line, which results in $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ for nuclei above $ ^{100} $Sn not being linearly dependent on $({N_pN_n})/({Z_0+N_0}) $.

    Figure 3.  (color online) Variations of extracted experimental $\alpha$-particle preformation factors $P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}}$ from Eq. (3) against $({N_pN_n})/({Z_0+N_0})$ for nuclei above $^{100}$Sn (left) and for nuclei above $^{208}$Pb (right).

    In 2014 and 2017, Wang et al. and Seif et al. adopted the generalized liquid drop model (GLDM) [46, 47] and the preformed cluster model (PCM) [48], respectively, to study the $ \alpha $ decay of even–even, odd-$ A $, and doubly odd nuclei around doubly magic $ ^{100} $Sn. In these works [4648], the calculated $ \alpha $ decay half-lives can accurately reproduce the experimental data, and the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors evidently depend on the odd–even effect. In addition, in these works [4648], the calculated $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors of nuclei near doubly magic nucleus $ ^{100} $Sn are of the order of $ 10^{-1} $, larger than ones of nuclei around doubly magic nucleus $ ^{208} $Pb. These works [4648] also find that the proton–neutron interaction plays an important role in the formation of an $ \alpha $ cluster. These important insights support this present work. However, our research further shows that the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors of nuclei near self-conjugate doubly magic $ ^{100} $Sn are significantly larger than those of analogous nuclei just above $ ^{208} $Pb, and they will be enhanced as the nuclei move towards the $ N = Z $ line. Furthermore, our research finds that the linear relationship between $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors and the product of valence protons and valence neutrons for nuclei around $ ^{208} $Pb is broken in the $ ^{100} $Sn region because the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factor is enhanced when the nucleus near $ ^{100} $Sn moves towards the $ N = Z $ line.

    In general, $ \alpha $ decay is approximatively treated as a quasi-stationary-state problem that is characterized by the orbital angular momentum $ l $ and the global quantum number $ G $. Based on the Wildermuth rule, the global quantum number $ G = 2n_r+l $ denotes the principal quantum number with the radial quantum number $ n_r $ and angular momentum quantum number $ l $. For $ \alpha $ decay [82], $ G $ can be obtained by

    $ \begin{array}{l} \ G = 2n_r+l = \left\{\begin{array}{lll} 18,\;\;\; {N} \leq82,\\ 20,\;\;\;82< {N} \leq126,\\ 22,\;\;\; {N} >126. \end{array}\right. \end{array} $

    (8)

    In the different major proton and neutron closed shells, the different global quantum numbers $ G $ describe the different $ \alpha $-core relative motion for $ \alpha $ decay near $ ^{100} $Sn and $ ^{208} $Pb, which maybe can also influence the $ \alpha $-particle preformation. In the cluster model [7, 28, 4345, 82], the quantum effect can be taken into account by the Bohr–Sommerfeld quasiclassical condition. However, the GLDM is a macroscopical model, which doesn't take into account the $ \alpha $-core relative motion. Therefore, the GLDM will need to be improved to introduce the $ \alpha $-core relative motion in the future.

    In summary, we have systematically studied the $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ of nuclei above doubly magic nuclei $ ^{100} $Sn and $ ^{208} $Pb, which are extracted from the ratios between the theoretical $ \alpha $-decay half-lives within the GLDM and the experimental data. The results show that $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ for nuclei near self-conjugate doubly magic $ ^{100} $Sn are significantly larger than those of analogous nuclei just above $ ^{208} $Pb, and they will be enhanced when the nucleus moves towards the $ N = Z $ line. The proton–neutron correlation energy $ E_{p-n} $ and two protons–two neutrons correlation energy $ E_{2p-2n} $ for nuclei near $ ^{100} $Sn are also larger than those of analogous nuclei just above $ ^{208} $Pb. This indicates that the interactions between protons and neutrons occupying similar single-particle orbitals could enhance $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ and result in the superallowed $ \alpha $ decay near doubly magic nucleus $ ^{100} $Sn. Furthermore, as the nucleus moves towards the $ N = Z $ line, the $ E_{2p-2n} $ energy shows an increased tendency which is the same as that of $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $, while the $ E_{p-n} $ energy doesn't follow this pattern, indicating that the $ E_{2p-2n} $ energy plays a more important role than $ E_{p-n} $ energy in $ \alpha $-particle preformation of superallowed $ \alpha $ decay. The linear relationship between $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ and the product of valence protons and valence neutrons $ ({N_pN_n})/({Z_0+N_0}) $ for nuclei above $ ^{208} $Pb is broken in the $ ^{100} $Sn region because $ P_{\alpha}^{\rm{Exp}} $ is enhanced when the nucleus near $ ^{100} $Sn moves towards the $ N = Z $ line. Also, the calculated $ \alpha $ decay half-lives can accurately reproduce experimental data including the newly observed self-conjugate nuclei $ ^{108} $Xe and $ ^{104} $Te. This letter also provides evidence of the significant role of the proton–neutron interaction on $ \alpha $-particle preformation, which can shed some new light on $ \alpha $ decay and $ \alpha $-particle preformation factors in nuclear physics research in the future.

Reference (82)

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return