Charged current quasi-elastic scattering of νμ off 12C

  • In this work, we study charged current quasi-elastic scattering (QES) of νμ off nucleon and nucleus using a formalism based on the Llewellyn Smith (LS) model. Parameterizations by Galster et al. are used for electric and magnetic Sach's form factors of the nucleons. We use the Fermi gas model along with the Pauli suppression condition to take into account the nuclear effects in the anti-neutrino—nucleus QES. We calculate νμ - p and νμ -12C charged current quasi-elastic scattering differential and total cross sections for different values of axial mass MA, and compare the results with data from the GGM, SKAT, BNL, NOMAD, MINERνA and MiniBooNE experiments. The present theoretical approach gives a good description of differential cross section data. The calculations with axial mass MA=0.979 and 1.05 GeV are compatible with data from most of the experiments.
      PCAS:
  • 加载中
  • [1] M. H. Ahn et al (K2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 90:041801(2003)
    [2] E. Aliu et al (K2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 94:081802(2005)
    [3] M. H. Ahn et al (K2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D, 74:072003(2006)
    [4] Y. Ashie et al (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D, 71:112005(2005)
    [5] Y. Takeuchi (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. Proc. Supl., 79:229- 232(2012)
    [6] P. Adamson et al (NOvA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(15):151806(2016)
    [7] P. Adamson et al (NOvA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D, 93(5):051104(2016)
    [8] P. Adamson et al (NOvA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 118(15):151802(2017)
    [9] P. Adamson et al (NOvA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 118(23):231801(2017)
    [10] S. Ahmed et al (ICAL Collaboration), Pramana, 88(5):79(2017)
    [11] J. A. Formaggio and G. P. Zeller, Rev. Mod. Phys., 84:1307(2012)
    [12] S. Bonetti, G. Carnesecchi, D. Cavalli, P. Negri, A. Pullia, M. Rollier, F. Romano, and R. Schira, Nuovo Cim. A, 38:260(1977)
    [13] N. Armenise et al, Nucl. Phys. B, 152:365(1979)
    [14] J. Brunner et al (SKAT Collaboration), Z. Phys. C, 45:551(1990)
    [15] G. Fanourakis et al, Phys. Rev. D, 21:562(1980)
    [16] V. Lyubushkin et al (NOMAD Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C, 63:355(2009)
    [17] L. Fields et al (MINERvA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 111(2):022501(2013)
    [18] A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D, 88(3):032001(2013)
    [19] K. S. Kuzmin, V. V. Lyubushkin, and V. A. Naumov, Eur. Phys. J. C, 54:517(2008)
    [20] C. H. Llewellyn Smith, Phys. Rept., 3:261(1972)
    [21] S. Galster, H. Klein, J. Moritz, K. H. Schmidt, D. Wegener, and J. Bleckwenn, Nucl. Phys. B, 32:221(1971)
    [22] R. A. Smith and E. J. Moniz, Nucl. Phys. B, 43:605(1972) Erratum:[Nucl. Phys. B, 101:547(1975)]
    [23] Amin A. Leghrouz, M. A. Abu-Samreh, and A. M. Saleh, J. Al-Aqsa Unv., 10(S.E.), (2006)
    [24] K. Saraswat, P. Shukla, V. Kumar, and V. Singh, Indian J. Phys., 92(2):249(2018)
    [25] L. Alvarez-Ruso, Y. Hayato, and J. Nieves, New J. Phys., 16:075015(2014)
    [26] R. Gran, J. Nieves, F. Sanchez, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. D, 88(11):113007(2013)
    [27] M. Martini, M. Ericson, G. Chanfray, and J. Marteau, Phys. Rev. C, 80:065501(2009)
    [28] M. Martini, M. Ericson, G. Chanfray, and J. Marteau, Phys. Rev. C, 81:045502(2010)
    [29] M. Martini, M. Ericson, and G. Chanfray, Phys. Rev. C, 84:055502(2011)
    [30] P. Stoler, Phys. Rept., 226:103(1993)
    [31] V. Bernard, L. Elouadrhiri, and U. G. Meissner, J. Phys. G, 28:R1(2002)
    [32] H. S. Budd, A. Bodek, and J. Arrington, hep-ex/0308005
    [33] H. S. Budd, A. Bodek, and J. Arrington, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl., 139:90(2005)
    [34] R. Bradford, A. Bodek, H. S. Budd, and J. Arrington, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl., 159:127(2006)
    [35] P. E. Bosted, Phys. Rev. C, 51:409(1995)
    [36] W. M. Alberico, S. M. Bilenky, C. Giunti, and K. M. Graczyk, Phys. Rev. C, 79:065204(2009)
    [37] A. F. Krutov and V. E. Troitsky, Eur. Phys. J. A, 16:285(2003)
    [38] E. J. Moniz, I. Sick, R. R. Whitney, J. R. Ficenec, R. D. Kephart, and W. P. Trower, Phys. Rev. Lett., 26:445(1971)
    [39] L. D. Kolupaeva, K. S. Kuzmin, O. N. Petrova, and I. M. Shandrov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 31(12):1650077(2016)
  • 加载中

Get Citation
Deepika Grover, Kapil Saraswat, Prashant Shukla and Venktesh Singh. Charged current quasi-elastic scattering of νμ off 12C[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(12): 123104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/12/123104
Deepika Grover, Kapil Saraswat, Prashant Shukla and Venktesh Singh. Charged current quasi-elastic scattering of νμ off 12C[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(12): 123104.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/12/123104 shu
Milestone
Received: 2018-07-23
Fund

    Supported by Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India

Article Metric

Article Views(1409)
PDF Downloads(44)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of Open Access content published by CPC, for content published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (“CC CY”), the users don’t need to request permission to copy, distribute and display the final published version of the article and to create derivative works, subject to appropriate attribution.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Charged current quasi-elastic scattering of νμ off 12C

    Corresponding author: Venktesh Singh,
  • 1.  Department of Physics, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
  • 2. Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India
  • 3. Homi Bhabha National Institute, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai 400094, India
Fund Project:  Supported by Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India

Abstract: In this work, we study charged current quasi-elastic scattering (QES) of νμ off nucleon and nucleus using a formalism based on the Llewellyn Smith (LS) model. Parameterizations by Galster et al. are used for electric and magnetic Sach's form factors of the nucleons. We use the Fermi gas model along with the Pauli suppression condition to take into account the nuclear effects in the anti-neutrino—nucleus QES. We calculate νμ - p and νμ -12C charged current quasi-elastic scattering differential and total cross sections for different values of axial mass MA, and compare the results with data from the GGM, SKAT, BNL, NOMAD, MINERνA and MiniBooNE experiments. The present theoretical approach gives a good description of differential cross section data. The calculations with axial mass MA=0.979 and 1.05 GeV are compatible with data from most of the experiments.

    HTML

Reference (39)

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return