The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references

Meng Wang; G. Audi; F. G. Kondev; W. J. Huang; S. Naimi; Xing Xu

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030003

Chinese Physics C> 2017, Vol. 41> Issue(3) : 030003 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030003

The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references

Meng Wang ^1,2,, ,
G. Audi ³ ,
F. G. Kondev ⁴ ,
W. J. Huang ³ ,
S. Naimi ⁵ ,
Xing Xu ¹

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
This paper is the second part of the new evaluation of atomic masses, AME2016. Using least-squares adjustments to all evaluated and accepted experimental data, described in Part I, we derive tables with numerical values and graphs to replace those given in AME2012. The first table lists the recommended atomic mass values and their uncertainties. It is followed by a table of the influences of data on primary nuclides, a table of various reaction and decay energies, and finally, a series of graphs of separation and decay energies. The last section of this paper lists all references of the input data used in the AME2016 and the NUBASE2016 evaluations (first paper in this issue).
- atomic mass evaluation ,
- atomic mass table ,
- separation and reaction energies ,
- trends from the mass surface

References

[1]	G. Audi, M. Wang, A.H. Wapstra, F.G. Kondev, M. MacCormick, X. Xu and B. Pfeiffer, Chin. Phys. C, 36: 1287 (2012)
[2]	M. Wang, G. Audi, A.H. Wapstra, F.G. Kondev, M. MacCormick, X. Xu and B. Pfeiffer, Chin. Phys. C, 36: 1603 (2012)
[3]	A.H. Wapstra, G. Audi and C. Thibault, Nucl. Phys. A, 729:129 (2003)
[4]	G. Audi, A.H. Wapstra and C. Thibault, Nucl. Phys. A, 729:337 (2003)
[5]	G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A, 595: 409 (1995)
[6]	G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A, 565: 1 (1993)
[7]	G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A, 565: 66 (1993)
[8]	C. Borcea, G. Audi, A.H. Wapstra and P. Favaron, Nucl. Phys. A, 565: 158 (1993)
[9]	G. Audi, A.H. Wapstra and M. Dedieu, Nucl. Phys. A, 565:193 (1993)
[10]	K.-N. Huang, M. Aoyagi, M.H. Chen, B. Crasemann and H. Mark, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 18: 243 (1976)
[11]	D. Lunney, J.M. Pearson and C. Thibault, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75: 1021 (2003)
[12]	B. Pritychenko, E. Bětk, M.A. Kellett, B. Singh and J. Totans, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 640: 213 (2011)

[1]	. Probing the cluster structure of ⁶Li with the ⁶Li + ¹²C nuclear reaction at 68 MeV. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(1): 014102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ae072b
[2]	Qing-Wu Wang , Xiao-Fu Łü , Hua-Zhong Guo . $ {\boldsymbol\rho\bf\to \boldsymbol\pi\boldsymbol\pi }$ Hadronic Decay in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio Model: Mass-Width Interplay and Beyond-RPA Corrections. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-7.
[3]	Renli Xu , Chen Wu , Jian Liu , Bin Hong , Jie Peng , Xiong Li , Ruxian Zhu , Zhizhen Zhao , Zhongzhou Ren . Ground-state properties of finite nuclei in relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov theory with an improved quark mass density-dependent model. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-12.
[4]	Hanmei Cao , Fanglei Zou , Xiaojun Sun , Jingshang Zhang . Effects of energy levels on the double-differential cross sections of outgoing charged particles for the n+¹⁹F reaction below 20 MeV. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 124107. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adf49f
[5]	Zhi-Lei Ma , Zhun Lu , Hao Liu , Li Zhang . Inelastic heavy quarkonium photoproduction in p-p and Pb-Pb collisions at LHC energies. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 103103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade1ca
[6]	xxx xx . Evaluation of the moments of inertia of forced split fragments for nuclei ²³²Th (n,f) and ²³⁸U (n,f). Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(): 1-15.
[7]	Ruifeng Zheng , Puxian Wei , Qiaoli Yang . Generation of axions and axion-like particles through mass parametric resonance induced by scalar perturbations in the early universe. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 125108. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adfa82
[8]	Sneha Pradhan , S. K. Maurya , A. Errehymy , G. Mustafa , P.K. Sahoo . Gravitationally deformed polytropic models in extended teleparallel gravity and influence of decoupling parameters on constraining mass-radius relation. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 105110. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade4a1
[9]	Xiaoxuan Lin , Wei Kou , Shixin Fu , Rong Wang , Chengdong Han , Xurong Chen . Revisiting the deuteron mass radius via near-threshold ρ⁰, ω, and ϕ meson photoproduction. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 103105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade1c9
[10]	Shuang Qu , Jin-Yan Zhang , Man Bao . Nuclear mass predictions with a Bayesian neural network. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 104106. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade958
[11]	Yi Wei Hao , Yi Fei Niu , Zhong Ming Niu . The Role of Fission in Mass Sensitivity Study of the r-process. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(): 1-7. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adfe55
[12]	LIANG Jun , LIU Yan-Chun , ZHU Qiao . Thermodynamics of noncommutative geometry inspired black holes based on Maxwell-Boltzmann smeared mass distribution. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(2): 025101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/2/025101
[13]	Li Yangguo . Antiproton -Nucleus Charge Exchange Reaction and Inelastic Scattering. Chinese Physics C, 1996, 20(11): 1021-1027.
[14]	ZHU Xiang , SHEN Wen-Qing , HU Xiao-Qing , ZHU Yong-Tai , WANG Bing . A SIMPLE MODEL ANALYSIS OF THE INCOMPLETE DIC REACTION. Chinese Physics C, 1990, 14(9): 835-841.
[15]	WU SHI-SHU . ON NUCLEAR SINGLE-PARTICLE POTENTIALS（Ⅲ）SINGLEPARTICLE ENERGIES DETERMINED BY THE NONHERMITIAN POTENTIAL U_αβ=M_αβ（ε_β）. Chinese Physics C, 1979, 3(4): 469-483.

Access

Get Citation

Meng Wang, G. Audi, F. G. Kondev, W. J. Huang, S. Naimi and Xing Xu. The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(3): 030003. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030003

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2017-03-10

Fund

This work has been undertaken with the endorsement of the IUPAP Commission on Symbols, Units, Nomenclature, Atomic Masses and Fundamental Constants (SUNAMCO).

Article Metric

Article Views(5566)
PDF Downloads(230)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references

Corresponding author: Meng Wang,

Received Date: 2017-03-10

Available Online: 2017-03-05

Fund Project: This work has been undertaken with the endorsement of the IUPAP Commission on Symbols, Units, Nomenclature, Atomic Masses and Fundamental Constants (SUNAMCO).

Abstract: This paper is the second part of the new evaluation of atomic masses, AME2016. Using least-squares adjustments to all evaluated and accepted experimental data, described in Part I, we derive tables with numerical values and graphs to replace those given in AME2012. The first table lists the recommended atomic mass values and their uncertainties. It is followed by a table of the influences of data on primary nuclides, a table of various reaction and decay energies, and finally, a series of graphs of separation and decay energies. The last section of this paper lists all references of the input data used in the AME2016 and the NUBASE2016 evaluations (first paper in this issue).

HTML

Reference (12)

The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article