The NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear properties

G. Audi; F. G. Kondev; Meng Wang; W. J. Huang; S. Naimi

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030001

Chinese Physics C> 2017, Vol. 41> Issue(3) : 030001 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030001

The NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear properties

G. Audi ¹ ,
F. G. Kondev ² ,
Meng Wang ^3,4,, ,
W. J. Huang ¹ ,
S. Naimi ⁵

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
This paper presents the NUBASE2016 evaluation that contains the recommended values for nuclear and decay properties of 3437 nuclides in their ground and excited isomeric (T_1/2≥100 ns) states. All nuclides for which any experimental information is known were considered. NUBASE2016 covers all data published by October 2016 in primary (journal articles) and secondary (mainly laboratory reports and conference proceedings) references, together with the corresponding bibliographical information. During the development of NUBASE2016, the data available in the "Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File" (ENSDF) database were consulted and critically assessed for their validity and completeness. Furthermore, a large amount of new data and some older experimental results that were missing from ENSDF were compiled, evaluated and included in NUBASE2016. The atomic mass values were taken from the "Atomic Mass Evaluation" (AME2016, second and third parts of the present issue). In cases where no experimental data were available for a particular nuclide, trends in the behavior of specific properties in neighboring nuclides (TNN) were examined. This approach allowed to estimate values for a range of properties that are labeled in NUBASE2016 as "non-experimental" (flagged "#"). Evaluation procedures and policies used during the development of this database are presented, together with a detailed table of recommended values and their uncertainties.
- NUBASE2016 evaluation ,
- nuclear properties ,
- Atomic Mass Evaluation (AME) ,
- excitation energies of isomers ,
- Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF)

References

[1]	G. Audi, O. Bersillon, J. Blachot and A. H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A, 624: 1-124 (1997)
[2]	G. Audi, O. Bersillon, J. Blachot and A. H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A, 729: 3 (2003)
[3]	Edited by Yu. Litvinov and K. Blaum, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 349-350: (2013)
[4]	T. Goigoux et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 117: 162501 (2016)
[5]	L. hrstrm and J. Reedijk, Pure Appl. Chem. 88: 1225 (2016)
[6]	C.J. Gallagher, Jr. and S. A. Moszkowski, Phys. Rev. 111: 1282 (1958)
[7]	M. MacCormick and G. Audi, Nucl. Phys. A, 925: 61 (2014)
[8]	E. P. Wigner, in Proceedings of the Robert A. Welch Foundation Conference on Chemical Research, edited by W. O. Milligan (Houston: Welch Foundation, 1958), Vol. 1, p. 88
[9]	M. S. Antony, J. Britz, J. B. Bueb and A. Pape, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 33: 447 (1985) M. S. Antony, J. Britz and A. Pape, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 34: 279 (1985) A. Pape and M. S. Antony, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 39: 201 (1988) M. S. Antony, J. Britz and A. Pape, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 40: 9 (1988)
[10]	J. C. Hardy, I. S. Towner, Phys. Rev. C, 91: 025501 (2015)
[11]	General Policies, Nuclear Data Sheets, 113: (2012) v
[12]	A. MacDonald, B. Karamy, K. Setoodehnia, B. Singh, Nucl. Data Sheets 114: 397 (2013)
[13]	J. Honkanen, J. yst and K. Eskola, Phys. Scr. 34: (1986) 608
[14]	P. G. Hansen and B. Jonson, Particle Emission from Nuclei, Vol.3, p. 157, CRC Press, Florida (1989)
[15]	M. Thoennessen, Rep. Prog. Phys., 76: 056301 (2013) and references therein
[16]	O. Bersillon and J. Blachot, NEANDC(E) 246/L, INDC(FR) 071/L, September 1991
[17]	https://www-nds.iaea.org/amdc/
[18]	R. D. Evans, The Atomic Nucleus (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1955) p. 766

[1]	Abdel Magied DIAB . Charmed Meson Structure across Crossover from SU(4) Polyakov Quark Meson Model with Isospin Asymmetry. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(1): 1-19.
[2]	Jialin He , Xinye Peng , Zhongbao Yin , Liang Zheng . Extracting the kinetic freeze-out properties of high energy pp collisions at the LHC with event shape classifiers. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-16.
[3]	Renli Xu , Chen Wu , Jian Liu , Bin Hong , Jie Peng , Xiong Li , Ruxian Zhu , Zhizhen Zhao , Zhongzhou Ren . Ground-state properties of finite nuclei in relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov theory with an improved quark mass density-dependent model. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-12.
[4]	B A Urazbekov , E K Almanbetova , A Azhibekov , B S Baimurzinova , K Dyussebayeva , T Issatayev , D M Janseitov , S M Lukyanov , Yu E Penionzhkevich , K Mendibayev , T K Zholdybayev . Probing the cluster structure of ⁶Li with the nuclear reaction ⁶Li + ¹²C at 68 MeV. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-11.
[5]	Ruifeng Zheng , Puxian Wei , Qiaoli Yang . Generation of axions and axion-like particles through mass parametric resonance induced by scalar perturbations in the early universe. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 125108. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adfa82
[6]	Sneha Pradhan , S. K. Maurya , A. Errehymy , G. Mustafa , P.K. Sahoo . Gravitationally deformed polytropic models in extended teleparallel gravity and influence of decoupling parameters on constraining mass-radius relation. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 105110. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade4a1
[7]	Xiaoxuan Lin , Wei Kou , Shixin Fu , Rong Wang , Chengdong Han , Xurong Chen . Revisiting the deuteron mass radius via near-threshold ρ⁰, ω, and ϕ meson photoproduction. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 103105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade1c9
[8]	Yi Wei Hao , Yi Fei Niu , Zhong Ming Niu . The Role of Fission in Mass Sensitivity Study of the r-process. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(): 1-7. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adfe55
[9]	Jin-Yu Huo , Rui Chen . Exploring the two-body strong decay properties of the possible ${\boldsymbol\Lambda_{\boldsymbol c}\boldsymbol K^{}}$ and ${\boldsymbol\Sigma_{\boldsymbol c}\boldsymbol K^{()}}$ molecules. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 103108. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adec4e
[10]	Zhi-Lei Ma , Zhun Lu , Hao Liu , Li Zhang . Inelastic heavy quarkonium photoproduction in p-p and Pb-Pb collisions at LHC energies. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 103103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade1ca
[11]	xxx xx . Evaluation of the moments of inertia of forced split fragments for nuclei ²³²Th (n,f) and ²³⁸U (n,f). Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(): 1-15.
[12]	Yangfan Guo , Zhou Yan , Xiaofei Yang , Shaojie Chen , Wencong Mei , Hanrui Hu , Yinshen Liu , Dongyang Chen , Chen Zhang , Tianxu Gao , Yipin Jing , Yanlin Ye . Development of cesium laser resonance ionization schemes for PLASEN experiment. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 124002. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adf49e
[13]	Shuang Qu , Jin-Yan Zhang , Man Bao . Nuclear mass predictions with a Bayesian neural network. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 104106. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade958
[14]	Peng Yin , Jianmin Dong , Wei Zuo . Effect of tensor correlations on the depletion of nuclear Fermi sea within the extended BHF approach. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(11): 114102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/11/114102
[15]	LIANG Jun , LIU Yan-Chun , ZHU Qiao . Thermodynamics of noncommutative geometry inspired black holes based on Maxwell-Boltzmann smeared mass distribution. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(2): 025101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/2/025101
[16]	M. Bashkanov (for the WASA-at-COSY collaboration) . ABC effect in double-pionic nuclear fusion and a pn resonance as its possible origin. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1339-1341. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/037
[17]	YE Yan-Lin , ZHOU Xiao-Hong , LIU Wei-Ping , MA Yu-Gang , ZHANG Yu-Hu , XU Fu-Rong . Outline of the progress in the study of radioactive nuclear physics and super-heavy nuclei. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(S2): 1-7.
[18]	Guo Hua . In-medium QMC Model Parameters and Quark Condensation in Nuclear Matter. Chinese Physics C, 1999, 23(5): 459-468.
[19]	Sa Ben-hao , Zhang Xi-zhen , Li Zhu-xia , Shi Yi-jin . A PRIMARY RESEARCH OF THE PHONON RENORMALIZATION OF NUCLEAR FIELD THEORY. Chinese Physics C, 1980, 4(3): 398-400.
[20]	WU SHI-SHU . ON NUCLEAR SINGLE-PARTICLE POTENTIALS（Ⅲ）SINGLEPARTICLE ENERGIES DETERMINED BY THE NONHERMITIAN POTENTIAL U_αβ=M_αβ（ε_β）. Chinese Physics C, 1979, 3(4): 469-483.

Access

Get Citation

G. Audi, F. G. Kondev, Meng Wang, W. J. Huang and S. Naimi. The NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear properties[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(3): 030001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030001

G. Audi, F. G. Kondev, Meng Wang, W. J. Huang and S. Naimi. The NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear properties[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(3): 030001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030001 shu

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2017-03-10

Fund

This work has been undertaken with the endorsement of the IUPAP Commission on Symbols, Units, Nomenclature, Atomic Masses and Fundamental Constants (SUNAMCO).

Article Metric

Article Views(4272)
PDF Downloads(249)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

The NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear properties

Corresponding author: Meng Wang,

Received Date: 2017-03-10

Available Online: 2017-03-05

Fund Project: This work has been undertaken with the endorsement of the IUPAP Commission on Symbols, Units, Nomenclature, Atomic Masses and Fundamental Constants (SUNAMCO).

Abstract: This paper presents the NUBASE2016 evaluation that contains the recommended values for nuclear and decay properties of 3437 nuclides in their ground and excited isomeric (T_1/2≥100 ns) states. All nuclides for which any experimental information is known were considered. NUBASE2016 covers all data published by October 2016 in primary (journal articles) and secondary (mainly laboratory reports and conference proceedings) references, together with the corresponding bibliographical information. During the development of NUBASE2016, the data available in the "Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File" (ENSDF) database were consulted and critically assessed for their validity and completeness. Furthermore, a large amount of new data and some older experimental results that were missing from ENSDF were compiled, evaluated and included in NUBASE2016. The atomic mass values were taken from the "Atomic Mass Evaluation" (AME2016, second and third parts of the present issue). In cases where no experimental data were available for a particular nuclide, trends in the behavior of specific properties in neighboring nuclides (TNN) were examined. This approach allowed to estimate values for a range of properties that are labeled in NUBASE2016 as "non-experimental" (flagged "#"). Evaluation procedures and policies used during the development of this database are presented, together with a detailed table of recommended values and their uncertainties.

HTML

Reference (18)

The NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear properties

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article