Is GW151226 really a gravitational wave signal?

Zhe Chang; Chao-Guang Huang; Zhi-Chao Zhao

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/2/025001

Chinese Physics C> 2017, Vol. 41> Issue(2) : 025001 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/2/025001

Is GW151226 really a gravitational wave signal?

Zhe Chang ^1,2,, ,
Chao-Guang Huang ^1,2,, ,
Zhi-Chao Zhao ^1,2,,

1.
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
2.
School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
Recently, the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration published the second observation of a gravitational wave, GW151226[Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241103 (2016)], from a binary black hole coalescence with initial masses about 14 M_⊙ and 8 M_⊙. They claimed that the peak gravitational strain was reached at about 450 Hz, the inverse of which is longer than the average time a photon stays in the Fabry-Perot cavities in the two arms. In this case, the phase-difference of a photon in the two arms due to the propagation of a gravitational wave does not always increase as the photon stays in the cavities. It might even be cancelled to zero in extreme cases. When the propagation effect is taken into account, we find that the claimed signal GW151226 almost disappears.
- gravitational wave ,
- gravitational wave detector ,
- LIGO

References

[1]	B. P. Abbott et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 116:061102(2016)
[2]	J. A. Orosz et al, Nature, 449:872-875(2007)
[3]	B. P. Abbott et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 116:241103(2016)
[4]	For example, see:E. D. Black and R. N. Gutenkunst, Am. J. Phys., 71:365-378(2003)
[5]	B. Allen, W. G. Anderson, P. R. Brady, D. A. Brown, and J. D. E. Creighton, Phys. Rev. D, 85:122006(2012)
[6]	Rakhmanov, M., J. D. Romano, and John T. Whelan, Class.Quantum Grav., 25.18:184017(2008)
[7]	K. S. Thorne, in Three hundred years of gravitation, edited by S. W. Hawking and W. Israel, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987), p.330
[8]	E.D. Black and R.N.Gutenkunst, Am. J. Phys., 69:79-87(2001)
[9]	https:\\losc.ligo.org\tutorials\
[10]	Chang Z, Huang CG, Zhao ZC, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astro., 59:100421(2016)
[11]	Abbott, B.P. and LIGO Scientific Collaboration, arXiv:1602. 03845, 2016

[1]	Tetsuaki Moriguchi , Momo Mukai , Naoto Kaname , Akira Ozawa , Shinji Suzuki , Yasushi Abe , Hiroki Arakawa , Tomoya Fujii , Daiki Hamakawa , Sakumi Harayama , Shun Hosoi , Yasuto Inada , Kumi Inomata , Reo Kagesawa , Daisuke Kajiki , Daiki Kamioka , Masanori Kanda , Atsushi Kitagawa , Takaaki Kobayashi , Daisuke Nagae , Sarah Naimi , Kunimitsu Nishimuro , Shunichiro Omika , Misaki Otsu , Mamoru Sakaue , Shinji Sato , Hibiki Seki , Naru Shinozaki , Takeshi Suzuki , Keisuke Tomita , Takayuki Yamaguchi , Yoshitaka Yamaguchi , Asahi Yano , Kenjiro Yokota . Improvements of time-of-flight detector utilizing a thin foil and crossed static electric and magnetic fields. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 104001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade95b
[2]	DU Ying-Shuai , YUE Qian , LIU Yi-Bao , CHEN Qing-Hao , LI Jin , CHENG Jian-Ping , KANG Ke-Jun , LI Yuan-Jing , LI Yu-Lan , MA Hao , XING Hao-Yang , YU Xun-Zhen , ZENG Zhi . Characterization of large area photomultiplier ETL 9357FLB for liquid argon detector. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(7): 076003. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/7/076003
[3]	ZHANG Cong , HE Yuan , ZHAO Hong-Wei , ZHANG Sheng-Hu . Multipacting simulation and analysis of a taper quarter wave cavity by using Analyst-PT3P. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(4): 362-366. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/4/012
[4]	GUO Yan-Qing , SONG Jie . Quantitative conditions for the formation of p-wave neutron halos. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(2): 158-162. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/35/2/010
[5]	YANG Hong-Xun (for the BESⅡ collaboration) . Partial wave analysis of J/ψ→ppπ⁰ and measurement of J/ψ→ppη, ppη´. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(12): 1331-1335. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/12/048

Access

Get Citation

Zhe Chang, Chao-Guang Huang and Zhi-Chao Zhao. Is GW151226 really a gravitational wave signal?[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(2): 025001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/2/025001

Zhe Chang, Chao-Guang Huang and Zhi-Chao Zhao. Is GW151226 really a gravitational wave signal?[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(2): 025001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/2/025001 shu

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2016-08-13

Fund

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11275207, 11375203, 11690022, 11675182) and Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Multi-waveband Gravitational Wave Universe (XDB23040000)

Article Metric

Article Views(2775)
PDF Downloads(30)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Is GW151226 really a gravitational wave signal?

Corresponding author: Zhe Chang,

Corresponding author: Chao-Guang Huang,

Corresponding author: Zhi-Chao Zhao,

1. Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
2. School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received Date: 2016-08-13
Available Online: 2017-02-05

Fund Project: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11275207, 11375203, 11690022, 11675182) and Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Multi-waveband Gravitational Wave Universe (XDB23040000)

Abstract: Recently, the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration published the second observation of a gravitational wave, GW151226[Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241103 (2016)], from a binary black hole coalescence with initial masses about 14 M_⊙ and 8 M_⊙. They claimed that the peak gravitational strain was reached at about 450 Hz, the inverse of which is longer than the average time a photon stays in the Fabry-Perot cavities in the two arms. In this case, the phase-difference of a photon in the two arms due to the propagation of a gravitational wave does not always increase as the photon stays in the cavities. It might even be cancelled to zero in extreme cases. When the propagation effect is taken into account, we find that the claimed signal GW151226 almost disappears.