Two-gluon and trigluon glueballs from dynamical holography QCD

Yi-dian Chen; Mei Huang

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/40/12/123101

Chinese Physics C> 2016, Vol. 40> Issue(12) : 123101 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/12/123101

Two-gluon and trigluon glueballs from dynamical holography QCD

Yi-dian Chen ^1,, ,
Mei Huang ^1,2,,

1.
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
2.
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3.
Theoretical Physics Center for Science Facilities, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
We study the scalar, vector and tensor two-gluon and trigluon glueball spectra in the framework of the 5-dimension dynamical holographic QCD model, where the metric structure is deformed self-consistently by the dilaton field. For comparison, the glueball spectra are also calculated in the hard-wall and soft-wall holographic QCD models. In order to distinguish glueballs with even and odd parities, we introduce a positive and negative coupling between the dilaton field and glueballs, and for higher spin glueballs, we introduce a deformed 5-dimension mass. With this set-up, there is only one free parameter from the quadratic dilaton profile in the dynamical holographic QCD model, which is fixed by the scalar glueball spectra. It is found that the two-gluon glueball spectra produced in the dynamical holographic QCD model are in good agreement with lattice data. Among six trigluon glueballs, the produced masses for 1^±- and 2^-- are in good agreement with lattice data, and the produced masses for 0^--, 0^+- and 2^+- are around 1.5 GeV lighter than lattice results. This result might indicate that the three trigluon glueballs of 0^--, 0^+- and 2^+- are dominated by the three-gluon condensate contribution.
- glueball ,
- holographic QCD model ,
- AdS/CFT correspondence

References

[1]	M. Gell-Mann, Acta Phys. Austriaca Suppl., 9:733(1972)
[2]	C. J. Morningstar and M. J. Peardon, Phys. Rev. D, 60:034509(1999)[hep-lat/9901004]
[3]	B. Lucini and M. Teper, JHEP, 0106, 050(2001)[hep-lat/0103027]
[4]	H. B. Meyer, arxiv:hep-lat/0508002
[5]	Y. Chen, A. Alexandru, S. J. Dong, T. Draper, I. Horvath, F. X. Lee, K. F. Liu and N. Mathur et al, Phys. Rev. D, 73:014516(2006)[hep-lat/0510074]
[6]	E. Gregory, A. Irving, B. Lucini, C. McNeile, A. Rago, C. Richards and E. Rinaldi, JHEP, 1210:170(2012)[arXiv:1208.1858[hep-lat]]
[7]	N. Isgur and J. E. Paton, Phys. Rev. D, 31:2910(1985)
[8]	T. Huang, H. Y. Jin and A. L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D, 59:034026(1999)[hep-ph/9807391]
[9]	C.-F. Qiao and L. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:221601(2014)
[10]	C. F. Qiao and L. Tang, arXiv:1509.00305[hep-ph]
[11]	V. Mathieu, N. Kochelev and V. Vento, arXiv:0810.4453[hep-ph]; E. Klempt and A. Zaitsev, Phys. Rept., 454:1(2007); C. Amsler and N. A. Tornqvist, Phys. Rept., 389:61(2004)
[12]	J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2:231(1998)[hep-th/9711200]
[13]	S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B, 428:105(1998)[hep-th/9802109]
[14]	E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2:253(1998)[hep-th/9802150]
[15]	O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, Y. Oz, Phys. Rept., 323183(2000); O. Aharony, arXiv:hep-th/0212193; A. Zaffaroni, PoS RTN2005, 005(2005); J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, I. Kirsch and E. Threlfall, Eur. Phys. J. A, 35:81(2008),[arXiv:0711.4467[hep-th]]
[16]	P. Kovtun, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94:111601(2005)[arXiv:hep-th/0405231]
[17]	J. Erlich, E. Katz, D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95:261602(2005)
[18]	A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. D, 74:015005(2006)
[19]	T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys., 113:843(2005); Prog. Theor. Phys., 114:1083(2006); G. F. de Teramond and S. J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94:201601(2005); L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, Nucl. Phys. B, 721:79(2005); K. Ghoroku, N. Maru, M. Tachibana and M. Yahiro, Phys. Lett. B, 633:602(2006); O. Andreev, V. I. Zakharov, arXiv:hep-ph/0703010; Phys. Rev. D, 74:025023(2006); M. Kruczenski, L. A. P. Zayas, J. Sonnenschein and D. Vaman, JHEP, 06:046(2005); S. Kuperstein and J. Sonnenschein, JHEP, 11:026(2004); H. Forkel, M. Beyer and T. Frederico, JHEP, 0707:077(2007)
[20]	Deog Ki Hong, Takeo Inami, and Ho-Ung Yee, Phys. Lett. B, 646:165-171(2007); Kanabu Nawa, Hideo Suganuma, and Toru Kojo, Phys.Rev.D 75:086003(2007); Deog Ki Hong, Mannque Rho, Ho-Ung Yee, and Piljin Yi, Phys.Rev.D 76:061901(2007)
[21]	C. Csaki, H. Ooguri, Y. Oz and J. Terning, JHEP, 9901:017(1999); R. de Mello Koch, A. Jevicki, M. Mihailescu and J. P. Nunes, Phys. Rev. D, 58:105009(1998); M. Zyskin, Phys. Lett. B, 439:373(1998); J. A. Minahan, JHEP, 9901:020(1999); C. Csaki, Y. Oz, J. Russo and J. Terning, Phys. Rev. D, 59:065012(1999); R. Apreda, D. E. Crooks, N. J. Evans and M. Petrini, JHEP, 0405:065(2004)
[22]	R. C. Brower, S. D. Mathur and C. I. Tan, Nucl. Phys. B, 587:249(2000)
[23]	H. Boschi-Filho and N. R. F. Braga, JHEP, 0305:009(2003); H. Boschi-Filho and N. R. F. Braga, Eur. Phys. J. C, 32:529(2004); H. Boschi-Filho, N. R. F. Braga and H. L. Carrion, Phys. Rev. D, 73:047901(2006)
[24]	P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, F. Jugeau and S. Nicotri, Phys. Lett. B, 652:73(2007)[hep-ph/0703316]. L. Bellantuono, P. Colangelo and F. Giannuzzi, arXiv:1507.07768[hep-ph]
[25]	H. Forkel, Phys. Rev. D, 78:025001(2008)[arXiv:0711.1179[hep-ph]]
[26]	T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys., 113:843(2005); Prog. Theor. Phys., 114, 1083(2006)
[27]	K. Hashimoto, C. I. Tan and S. Terashima, Phys. Rev. D, 77:086001(2008)[arXiv:0709.2208[hep-th]]. F. Brnner, D. Parganlija and A. Rebhan, Phys. Rev. D, 91(10):106002(2015)[arXiv:1501.07906[hep-ph]]. F. Brnner and A. Rebhan, Phys. Rev. Lett., 115(13):131601(2015)[arXiv:1504.05815[hep-ph]]
[28]	D. Li, M. Huang and Q.-S. Yan, Eur. Phys. J. C, 73:2615(2013)[arXiv:1206.2824[hep-th]]
[29]	D. Li and M. Huang, JHEP, 1311:088(2013)[arXiv:1303.6929[hep-ph]]
[30]	D. Li and M. Huang, arXiv:1311.0593[hep-ph]
[31]	D. Li, J. Liao and M. Huang, Phys. Rev. D, 89(12):126006(2014)[arXiv:1401.2035[hep-ph]]
[32]	D. Li, S. He and M. Huang, JHEP, 1506:046(2015)[arXiv:1411.5332[hep-ph]]
[33]	K. Chelabi, Z. Fang, M. Huang, D. Li and Y. L. Wu, arXiv:1511.02721[hep-ph]
[34]	Jaffe R. L., Phys. Rev. D, 15:267(1977)
[35]	K. F. Liu, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 168:160(2007); Liu K. F., Wong C. W., Phys. Lett. B, 107:391(1981); Cheng H. Y., Chua C. K., Liu K. F., Phys. Rev. D, 74:094005(2006);'t Hooft G., Isidori G., et al, Phys. Lett. B, 662:424(2008); Zhao Q., Zou B. s., Ma Z. b., Phys. Lett. B, 631:22(2005); Bugg D. V., Peardon M. J., Zou B. S., Phys. Lett. B, 486(2000):49; Narison S., Nucl.Phys.Proc.Suppl., 186:306-311(2009)
[36]	B. A. Li, Phys. Rev. D, 81:114002(2010)[arXiv:0912.2323[hep-ph]]. H. Y. Cheng, AIP Conf. Proc., 1257, 477(2010)[arXiv:0912.3561[hep-ph]]. S. Janowski, F. Giacosa and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D, 90(11):114005(2014)[arXiv:1408.4921[hep-ph]]. W. I. Eshraim, arXiv:1509.09117[hep-ph]. S. He, M. Huang and Q. S. Yan, Phys. Rev. D, 81:014003(2010)[arXiv:0903.5032[hep-ph]]. T. K. Mukherjee, M. Huang and Q. S. Yan, Phys. Rev. D, 86:114022(2012)[arXiv:1203.5717[hep-ph]]. T. K. Mukherjee and M. Huang, Phys. Rev. D, 89(7):076002(2014)[arXiv:1311.1313[hep-ph]]
[37]	F. Zuo, Phys. Rev. D, 82:086011(2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.086011[arXiv:0909.4240[hep-ph]]
[38]	S. J. Brodsky, G. F. de Teramond and A. Deur, Phys. Rev. D, 81:096010(2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.096010[arXiv:1002.3948[hep-ph]]
[39]	A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, JHEP, 1104:066(2011) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2011)066[arXiv:1012.4813[hep-ph]]
[40]	D. Li, S. He, M. Huang and Q. S. Yan, JHEP, 1109:041(2011) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2011)041[arXiv:1103.5389[hep-th]]
[41]	T. Gutsche, V. E. Lyubovitskij, I. Schmidt and A. Vega, Phys. Rev. D, 85:076003(2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.076003[arXiv:1108.0346[hep-ph]]
[42]	K. Chelabi, Z. Fang, M. Huang, D. Li and Y. L. Wu, Phys. Rev. D, 93(10):101901(2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.101901[arXiv:1511.02721[hep-ph]]
[43]	K. Chelabi, Z. Fang, M. Huang, D. Li and Y. L. Wu, JHEP, 1604:036(2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2016)036[arXiv:1512.06493[hep-ph]]
[44]	S. Narison and G. Veneziano, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 4:2751(1989). doi:10.1142/S0217751X89001060
[45]	J. I. Latorre, S. Narison and S. Paban, Phys. Lett. B, 191:437(1987). doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90636-8
[46]	S. Narison, Nucl. Phys. B, 509:312(1998) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00562-2[hep-ph/9612457]

[1]	Peng-Zhang He , Hai-Qing Zhang . Holographic timelike entanglement entropy from Rindler method. Chinese Physics C, 2024, 48(11): 115113. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad57a8
[2]	Xi-Hao Fang , Fang-Zhong Chen , Jia-Rui Sun . Surface growth approach for bulk reconstruction in the AdS/BCFT correspondence. Chinese Physics C, 2024, 48(6): 065106. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad32be
[3]	Xin-Yun Hu , M. Israr Aslam , Rabia Saleem , Xiao-Xiong Zeng . Dynamics of holographic images of scalar-tensor-vector gravity-AdS black holes. Chinese Physics C, 2024, 48(9): 095108. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad57a5
[4]	M. Israr Aslam , Xiao-Xiong Zeng , Rabia Saleem , Xin-Yun Hu . Holographic Einstein ring of a charged Rastall AdS black hole with bulk electromagnetic field. Chinese Physics C, 2024, 48(11): 115101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad6551
[5]	Wen-Bin Chang , De-fu Hou . Complexity growth in a holographic QCD model. Chinese Physics C, 2024, 48(3): 034106. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad1b3e
[6]	Xing-Dao Guo , Hong-Wei Ke , Ming-Gang Zhao , Liang Tang , Xue-Qian Li . Revisiting the determining fraction of glueball component in f₀ mesons via radiative decays of J/ψ. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(2): 023104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abccad
[7]	Yue Ding , Zi-qiang Zhang . Holographic Schwinger effect in a soft wall AdS/QCD model. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(1): 013111. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abc240
[8]	Xun Chen , Danning Li , Mei Huang . Criticality of QCD in a holographic QCD model with critical end point. Chinese Physics C, 2019, 43(2): 023105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/43/2/023105
[9]	Wei Sun , Long-Cheng Gui , Ying Chen , Ming Gong , Chuan Liu , Yu-Bin Liu , Zhaofeng Liu , Jian-Ping Ma , Jian-Bo Zhang . Glueball spectrum from N_f=2 lattice QCD study on anisotropic lattices. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(9): 093103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/9/093103
[10]	Ling-Xiao Cui , Zhen Fang , Yue-Liang Wu . Finite temperature effect in infrared-improved AdS/QCD model with back reaction of bulk vacuum. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(6): 063101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/6/063101
[11]	Hao Ouyang , Jun-Bao Wu , Jia-Ju Zhang . Exact results for Wilson loops in orbifold ABJM theory. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(8): 083101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/8/083101
[12]	BAI Nan , CHEN Hui-Huang , WU Jun-Bao . Holographic cusped Wilson loops in q-deformed AdS₅× S⁵ spacetime. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(10): 103102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/10/103102
[13]	LI Xue-Feng , ZHANG Ai-Lin . Scalar glueball in a soft-wall model of AdS/QCD. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(1): 013102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/1/013102
[14]	WANG Hong-Min , HOU Zhao-Yu , LIU Jia-Fu , SUN Xian-Jing . Charm structure functions and gluon shadowing effects with the AdS/CFT model. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(8): 691-696. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/8/002
[15]	Frederic Jugeau . Holographic models of the scalar sector of QCD. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1516-1519. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/088
[16]	CHU Shao-Xia , HOU De-Fu , REN Hai-Cang . On the Next-leading order Heavy-Quark Potential from AdS/CFT. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1355-1359. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/041
[17]	Chul Kim , Youngman Kim . Hadrons from a hard wall AdS/QCD model. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1520-1522. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/089
[18]	LU Zhun . Comparing AdS/CFT dipole model to HERA F₂ data. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1421-1424. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/060
[19]	JIA Duojie . Abelian-Higgs phase of SU(2) QCD and glueball energy. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(7): 509-514. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/32/7/001
[20]	Shen Qbdng , Yu Hong . The Glueball Explanation for the ξ (2230). Chinese Physics C, 1990, 14(S3): 255-258.

Access

Get Citation

Yi-dian Chen and Mei Huang. Two-gluon and trigluon glueballs from dynamical holography QCD[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(12): 123101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/12/123101

Yi-dian Chen and Mei Huang. Two-gluon and trigluon glueballs from dynamical holography QCD[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(12): 123101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/12/123101 shu

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2016-01-23
Revised: 2016-09-03

Fund

Supported by the NSFC (11175251, 11621131001), DFG and NSFC (CRC 110), CAS Key Project KJCX2-EW-N01, K.C.Wong Education Foundation, and Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS

Article Metric

Article Views(1800)
PDF Downloads(93)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of Open Access content published by CPC, for content published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (“CC CY”), the users don’t need to request permission to copy, distribute and display the final published version of the article and to create derivative works, subject to appropriate attribution.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Two-gluon and trigluon glueballs from dynamical holography QCD

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article

Two-gluon and trigluon glueballs from dynamical holography QCD

Corresponding author: Yi-dian Chen, chenyd@ihep.ac.cn

Corresponding author: Mei Huang, chenyd@ihep.ac.cn

HTML

目录