Self-attenuation corrections calculated by LabSOCS Simulations for gamma-spectrometric measurements with HPGe detectors

TIAN Zi-Ning; OUYANG Xiao-Ping; LIU Yang; CHEN Liang; LIU Jin-Liang; ZHANG Xian-Peng; SONG Ji-Wen; ZENG Ming

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/38/7/076002

Chinese Physics C> 2014, Vol. 38> Issue(7) : 076002 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/7/076002

Self-attenuation corrections calculated by LabSOCS Simulations for gamma-spectrometric measurements with HPGe detectors

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
Simulations from Laboratory Sourceless Object Counting System (LabSOCS) software were used to determine self-attenuation correction factor, which is defined as the efficiency ratio of the sample with the absorbing medium to that of the sample without absorbing medium. The semi-empirical self-attenuation correction formula F(μ) used to correct self-attenuation of a sample was applied. A comparison of the two methods reveals that formula of sample with φ 75 mm× 25 mm and φ75 mm× 10 mm can be, respectively, used in the self-attenuation correction for μ in the ranges of 0 to 0.5 cm^-1 and 0.5 cm^-1 to 2.0 cm^-1, indicating that the semi-empirical formula will not be used when μ has exceeded the interval. The semi-empirical formula value is consistent with the experimental value, within 7.9% accuracy. Therefore, this method is correct and effective. Both of our two methods can accurately produce a relative self-attenuation correction factor when the composition of the sample is known. The self-attenuation correction of a sample with unknown composition can only be carried out using a semi-empirical formula method.

References

[1]

Díaz N C, Vargas M J. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 2008, 586: 204-210[2] Francisco Hernández, Farid EI-Daoushy. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 2002, 484: 625-641[3] Aaltonen H, Klemola S, Ugletveit F. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 1994, 339: 87-91[4] Vargas M J, Timón A F, Díaz N C et al. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 2002, 57: 893-898[5] Huy N Q, Binh D Q, An V X. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 2007, 573: 384-388[6] Stocki T J, Bean M, Ungar R K et al. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 2004, 61: 231-235[7] Pilleyre T, Sanzelle S, Miallier D et al. Radiat. Meas., 2006, 41: 323-329[8] CHEN Zhi-Lin, SONG Guo-Yang, MU Long et al. Chinese Physics C (HEP NP), 2010, 34: 560-564[9] JI Chang-Song. Handbook of Nuclear Radiation Detectors Their Experiment Techniques. Beijing: Atomic Energy Press, 1990. 76-89 (in Chinese)[10] TIAN Zi-Ning, JIA Ming-Yan, LI Hui-Bin et al. Radiation Protection, 2010, 30(01): 54-62 (in Chinese)[11] TIAN Zi-Ning, OUYANG Xiao-Ping, FENG Tian-Cheng et al. Nuclear Electronics Detection Technology, 2013, 33(2): 130-134 (in Chinese)[12] TIAN Zi-Ning, OUYANG Xiao-Ping, HUANG Xiong-Liang et al. Nuclear Techniques, 2011, 34(9): 832-836 (in Chinese)[13] TIAN Zi-Ning, JIA Ming-Yan, SHEN Mao-Quan et al. Radiation Protection, 2010, 30(05): 54-62 (in Chinese)[14] González J C, Díaz N C,Vargas M J et al. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 2010, 68: 360-363[15] YAN Wei-Hua, ZHANG Li-Guo, ZHANG Zhao et al. Chinese Physics C (HEP NP), 2012, 36: 1082-1088

[1]	Wen-Jian Lin , Jian-Wei Zhao , Bao-Hua Sun , Liu-Chun He , Wei-Ping Lin , Chuan-Ye Liu , Isao Tanihata , Satoru Terashima , Yi Tian , Feng Wang , Meng Wang , Guang-Xin Zhang , Xue-Heng Zhang , Li-Hua Zhu , Li-Min Duan , Rong-Jiang Hu , Zhong Liu , Chen-Gui Lu , Pei-Pei Ren , Li-Na Sheng , Zhi-Yu Sun , Shi-Tao Wang , Tao-Feng Wang , Zhi-Guo Xu , Yong Zheng . Plastic scintillation detectors for precision Time-of-Flight measurements of relativistic heavy ions. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(6): 066001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/066001
[2]	Zhe Duan , Qing Qin . Simulations to study the static polarization limit for RHIC lattice. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(1): 017002. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/1/017002
[3]	Ji-Feng Chen , Ke-Zhu Song , Jia-Cheng Liu . Dedicated 4πβ (LS)-γ (HPGe) digital coincidence system based on synchronous high-speed multichannel data acquisition. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(3): 036101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/3/036101
[4]	LI Rong-Hua , LI Zhan-Kui , YANG Lei , LI Dong-Mei , LI Hai-Xia , WANG Zhu-Sheng , CHEN Cui-Hong , TAN Ji-Lian , LIU Feng-Qiong , RONG Xin-Juan , WANG Xiu-Hua , LI Chun-Yan , ZU Kai-Ling , LU Zi-Wei . Phonon contribution to nonionizing energy loss in silicon detectors. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(6): 066004. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/6/066004
[5]	LI Hai-Xia , LI Zhan-Kui , WANG Fang-Cong , LI Rong-Hua , CHEN Cui-Hong , WANG Xiu-Hua , RONG Xin-Juan , LIU Feng-Qiong , WANG Zhu-Sheng , LI Chun-Yan , ZU Kai-Ling , LU Zi-Wei . Application of stratified implantation for silicon micro-strip detectors. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(6): 066005. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/6/066005
[6]	GU Xiao-Yue , LI Lin , YIN Peng-Fei , YUN Ming-Kai , CHAI Pei , HUANG Xian-Chao , SUN Xiao-Li , WEI Long . Attenuation correction with region growing method used in the positron emission mammography imaging system. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(10): 108202. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/10/108202
[7]	LIU Long , HUANG Yang , XU Qing , YAN Ling-Tong , LI Li , FENG Song-Lin , FENG Xiang-Qian . Attenuation correction of L-shell X-ray fluorescence computed tomography imaging. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(3): 038203. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/3/038203
[8]	YANG Xiong-Bin , HOU Mi . Transverse wakefield calculated by the double circuit model. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(3): 037001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/3/037001
[9]	WANG Lu , CHAI Pei , WU Li-Wei , YUN Ming-Kai , ZHOU Xiao-Lin , LIU Shuang-Quan , ZHANG Yu-Bao , SHAN Bao-Ci , WEI Long . Attenuation correction for dedicated breast PET using only emission data based on consistency conditions. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(1): 018201. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/1/018201
[10]	GAO Long , YU Bo-Xiang , DING Ya-Yun , ZHOU Li , WEN Liang-Jian , XIE Yu-Guang , WANG Zhi-Gang , CAI Xiao , SUN Xi-Lei , FANG Jian , XUE Zhen , ZHANG Ai-Wu , SUN Li-Jun , GE Yong-Shuai , LIU Ying-Biao , NIU Shun-Li , HU Tao , CAO Jun , , . Attenuation length measurements of a liquid scintillator with LabVIEW and reliability evaluation of the device. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(7): 076001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/7/076001
[11]	WANG Xiao-Hu , WU Jun-Long , LI Jiang-Bo . Simulation study of the parallax effectof gaseous detectors. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(11): 1106-1110. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/11/012
[12]	LI Yu-Lan , LI Jin , YUE Qian , LI Yuan-Jing , . MSE/SSE discrimination methods of the PC-HPGe detector. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(9): 855-860. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/9/011
[13]	YANG He-Run , HU Bi-Tao , ZHANG Xiao-Dong , ZOU Chun-Yan . Experimental studies of micromegas detectors with different micro-meshes. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(2): 174-178. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/35/2/013
[14]	XU Yan-Bing , WANG Huan-Yu , MENG Xiang-Cheng , WANG Hui , LU Hong , MA Yu-Qian , LI Xin-Qiao , SHI Feng , WANG Ping , ZHAO Xiao-Yun , WU Feng . Design and simulations for the detector based on DSSSD. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(12): 1846-1851.
[15]	CHEN Zhi-Lin , SONG Guo-Yang , MU Long , WANG He-Yi , XING Shi-Xiong , GUO Hong-Bo , LIAO Zhen-Xing , CHEN Ping , HUA Sheng . Optimum condition of efficiency functions for HPGe γ-ray detectors in the 121-1408 keV energy range. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(5): 560-564. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/5/009
[16]	ZHOU Yi , LI Cheng . Research on the delay-line readout for GEM detectors. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(S2): 232-234.
[17]	ZHU Jie , MA Hong-Guang , MA Wen-Yan , ZENG Hui , WANG Zhao-Min , XU Zi-Zhong . Comparison of two position sensitive gamma-ray detectors based on continuous YAP and pixellated NaI(TI) for nuclear medical imaging applications. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(11): 934-938. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/32/11/018
[18]	ZHOU Feng-Qun , YANG Jing-Kang , TUO Fei , YI Yan-Ling , KONG Xiang-Zhong . Experimental Study on the Method of Deadtime Correction For HPGe Spectrometer System. Chinese Physics C, 2005, 29(12): 1175-1178.
[19]	YUE Qian , CHENG Jian-Ping , LI Yuan-Jing , LI Jin , WANG Zi-Jing . Detection of WIMPs Using Low Threshold HPGe Detector. Chinese Physics C, 2004, 28(8): 877-880.
[20]	Zhang Tianbao , Wang Shuying , Wang Haidong , Shen Zhiqi , Meng Bonian . Precise Measurement of Gamma Ray Energies with HPGe Spectrometer by Slithering Comparison Method. Chinese Physics C, 1993, 17(S1): 25-31.

Access

Get Citation

TIAN Zi-Ning, OUYANG Xiao-Ping, LIU Yang, CHEN Liang, LIU Jin-Liang, ZHANG Xian-Peng, SONG Ji-Wen and ZENG Ming. Self-attenuation corrections calculated by LabSOCS Simulations for gamma-spectrometric measurements with HPGe detectors[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(7): 076002. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/7/076002

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2013-08-16
Revised: 1900-01-01

Article Metric

Article Views(1892)
PDF Downloads(120)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Self-attenuation corrections calculated by LabSOCS Simulations for gamma-spectrometric measurements with HPGe detectors

Corresponding author: OUYANG Xiao-Ping,

Received Date: 2013-08-16

Accepted Date: 1900-01-01

Available Online: 2014-07-05

Abstract: Simulations from Laboratory Sourceless Object Counting System (LabSOCS) software were used to determine self-attenuation correction factor, which is defined as the efficiency ratio of the sample with the absorbing medium to that of the sample without absorbing medium. The semi-empirical self-attenuation correction formula F(μ) used to correct self-attenuation of a sample was applied. A comparison of the two methods reveals that formula of sample with φ 75 mm× 25 mm and φ75 mm× 10 mm can be, respectively, used in the self-attenuation correction for μ in the ranges of 0 to 0.5 cm^-1 and 0.5 cm^-1 to 2.0 cm^-1, indicating that the semi-empirical formula will not be used when μ has exceeded the interval. The semi-empirical formula value is consistent with the experimental value, within 7.9% accuracy. Therefore, this method is correct and effective. Both of our two methods can accurately produce a relative self-attenuation correction factor when the composition of the sample is known. The self-attenuation correction of a sample with unknown composition can only be carried out using a semi-empirical formula method.

HTML

Reference (1)

Self-attenuation corrections calculated by LabSOCS Simulations for gamma-spectrometric measurements with HPGe detectors

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article