Comparison of the PIC model and the Lie algebraic method in the simulation of intense continuous beam transport

ZHAO Xiao-Song; LV Jian-Qin

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/33/S2/032

Chinese Physics C> 2009, Vol. 33> Issue(S2) : 125-127 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/S2/032

Comparison of the PIC model and the Lie algebraic method in the simulation of intense continuous beam transport

ZHAO Xiao-Song ^, ,
LV Jian-Qin

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
Both the PIC (Particle-In-Cell) model and the Lie algebraic method can be used to simulate the transport of intense continuous beams. The PIC model is to calculate the space charge field, which is blended into the external field, and then simulate the trajectories of particles in the total field; the Lie algebraic method is to simulate the intense continuous beam transport with transport matrixes. Two simulation codes based on the two methods are developed respectively, and the simulated results of transport in a set of electrostatic lenses are compared. It is found that the results from the two codes are in agreement with each other, and both approaches have their own merits.

References

[1]

. Crandall K R, Rusthoi D P. Trace3-D Documentation,1997, LA-UR-97-8862. Yuri K. Batygin. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 2005, 539: 455-4893. XING Qing-Zi, LIN Yu-Zheng, FU Shi-Nian. Nuclear Tech-niques, 2005, 28: 342-348 (in Chinese)4. LU Jian-Qin, LI Jin-Hai. Chinese Physics, 2004, 13:1665-16685. LU Jian-Qin, ZHANG Zhuo. Chinese Physics, 2007, 16:1280-1284

[1]	Abdel Magied DIAB . Charmed Meson Structure across Crossover from SU(4) Polyakov Quark Meson Model with Isospin Asymmetry. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(1): 1-19.
[2]	Zhe Wang , Quan Liu , Jian-You Guo . Examination of proton radioactivity in exotic nuclei with a deformed Gamow-like model. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-10. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ae042f
[3]	Wen-Chao Dai , Jie-Dong Jiang , Yin Fan , Xiao Liu , Peng-Cheng Chu , Xi-Jun Wu , Xiao-Hua Li . Systematic study of α decay half-life within cluster-formation model. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(1): 1-26.
[4]	Fan Yang , Xiangyun Fu , Bing Xu , Kaituo Zhang , Yang Huang , Ying Yang . Testing the cosmic distance duality relation using Type Ia supernovae and radio quasars through model-independent methods. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 105108. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade4a3
[5]	Sen Guo , Pei Wang , Ke-Jian He , Guo-Ping Li , Xiao-Xiong Zeng , Wen-Hao Deng . A novel jet model for the Novikov-Thorne disk and its observable impact. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(8): 085104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/add10e
[6]	Xin-Xin Qi , Hao Sun . Copositive criteria for a two-component dark matter model. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 103101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade4b7
[7]	Siyu Tang , Zuman Zhang , Chao Zhang , Liang Zheng , Renzhuo Wan . Investigating the transverse-momentum- and pseudorapidity-dependent flow vector decorrelation in p–Pb collisions with a multi-phase transport model. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 124104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adef1b
[8]	Hong-Lei Li , Peng-Cheng Lu , Cong-Feng Qiao , Zong-Guo Si , Ying Wang . Study of the Standard Model and Majorana neutrino contributions to ${ B}^{{ +}} { \to} { K}^{{ (*){ \pm}}}{ \mu}^{ +}{ \mu}^{{ \mp}}$. Chinese Physics C, 2019, 43(2): 023101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/43/2/023101
[9]	D. Banerjee , S. Sahoo . Analysis of λ_b→λ l⁺l^- rare decays in a non-universal Z' model. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(8): 083101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/8/083101
[10]	YAN Jia-Qing , XIE Yu-Guang , HU Tao , LU Jun-Guang , ZHOU Li , QU Guo-Pu , CAI Xiao , NIU Shun-Li , CHEN Hai-Tao . Simulation and performance study of ceramic THGEM. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(6): 066001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/6/066001
[11]	HUANG Jiang , XIONG Yong-Qian , CHEN De-Zhi , LIU Kai-Feng , YANG Jun , LI Dong , YU Tiao-Qin , FAN Ming-Wu , YANG Bo . A permanent magnet electron beam spread system used fora low energy electron irradiation accelerator. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(10): 107008. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/10/107008
[12]	ZHANG Cong , HE Yuan , ZHAO Hong-Wei , ZHANG Sheng-Hu . Multipacting simulation and analysis of a taper quarter wave cavity by using Analyst-PT3P. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(4): 362-366. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/4/012
[13]	WANG Ji-Ke , MAO Ze-Pu , BIAN Jian-Ming , CAO Guo-Fu , CAO Xue-Xiang , CHEN Shen-Jian , DENG Zi-Yan , FU Cheng-Dong , GAO Yuan-Ning , HE Kang-Lin , HE Miao , HUA Chun-Fei , HUANG Bin , HUANG Xing-Tao , JI Xiao-Bin , LI Fei , LI Hai-Bo , LI Wei-Dong , LIANG Yu-Tie , LIU Chun-Xiu , LIU Huai-Min , LIU Suo , LIU Ying-Jie , MA Qiu-Mei , MA Xiang , MAO Ya-Jun , MO Xiao-Hu , PAN Ming-Hua , PANG Cai-Ying , PING Rong-Gang , QIN Ya-Hong , QIU Jin-Fa , SUN Sheng-Sen , SUN Yong-Zhao , WANG Liang-Liang , WEN Shuo-Pin , , , , , , . Software alignment of the BESⅢ main drift chamber using the Kalman Filter method. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(3): 210-216. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/3/010
[14]	ZHANG Man-Zhou , HOU Jie , LI Hao-Hu , LIU Gui-Min , LI De-Ming . Optimal sorting method and application to SSRF booster dipoles. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(11): 924-927. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/32/11/015
[15]	GUO Yun-Jun , HE Kang-Lin . Muon Identification Using the Efficiencies Ratio Method at BESⅡ. Chinese Physics C, 2007, 31(11): 1050-1055.
[16]	HU Xi-Duo , SHAO Ming-Zhu , LUO Shi-Yu , LIU Yong-Sheng , ZHU De-Hai . Average Field Idea and Single Particle Model for 2 Dimension Crystallization Beams(Ⅱ). Chinese Physics C, 2004, 28(2): 196-199.
[17]	Guo Hua . In-medium QMC Model Parameters and Quark Condensation in Nuclear Matter. Chinese Physics C, 1999, 23(5): 459-468.
[18]	ZHU Xiang , SHEN Wen-Qing , HU Xiao-Qing , ZHU Yong-Tai , WANG Bing . A SIMPLE MODEL ANALYSIS OF THE INCOMPLETE DIC REACTION. Chinese Physics C, 1990, 14(9): 835-841.
[19]	WANG Man , LI Jin , CUI Xiang-Zong , XIA Xiao-Mi , LAI Yuan-Fen , YAO Xiao-Guang . PROTOTYPE OF END CAP SHOWER COUNTERAND ITS BEAM TEST. Chinese Physics C, 1987, 11(3): 321-326.
[20]	CHANG KONG-LIANG . DIMENSIONAL METHOD TO SOLVE THE DIFFUSION CONVECTION EQUATION OF SOLAR COSMIC RAYS. Chinese Physics C, 1978, 2(3): 200-210.

Access

Get Citation

ZHAO Xiao-Song and LV Jian-Qin. Comparison of the PIC model and the Lie algebraic method in the simulation of intense continuous beam transport[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(S2): 125-127. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/S2/032

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2009-01-06
Revised: 1900-01-01

Article Metric

Article Views(3826)
PDF Downloads(579)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Comparison of the PIC model and the Lie algebraic method in the simulation of intense continuous beam transport

Corresponding author: ZHAO Xiao-Song,

Received Date: 2009-01-06

Accepted Date: 1900-01-01

Available Online: 2009-01-08

Abstract:

Both the PIC (Particle-In-Cell) model and the Lie algebraic method can be used to simulate the transport of intense continuous beams. The PIC model is to calculate the space charge field, which is blended into the external field, and then simulate the trajectories of particles in the total field; the Lie algebraic method is to simulate the intense continuous beam transport with transport matrixes. Two simulation codes based on the two methods are developed respectively, and the simulated results of transport in a set of electrostatic lenses are compared. It is found that the results from the two codes are in agreement with each other, and both approaches have their own merits.

HTML

Reference (1)

Comparison of the PIC model and the Lie algebraic method in the simulation of intense continuous beam transport

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article