Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related
PDF
-
This paper was published online on March 2026 with display errors in Fig. 5.
Figure 5. (color online) The coverage ability of CEPC for surviving samples in the
$ {\mu _{\tau \tau }}$ versus$ {\mu _{\gamma \gamma }}$ plane at$ \sqrt s $ = 210 GeV (left panel) and$ \sqrt s $ = 240 GeV (right panel). CEPC with L = 100, 200, 800, and 1.22 can cover the red, yellow, blue, and green samples at the 5σ level, respectively. All the surviving samples can be covered at 5σ for$ \sqrt s $ = 210 GeV with L = 800 and$ \sqrt s $ = 240 GeV with L = 1.22. The red star marks the best-fit point. The green and purple shaded bands indicate the experimental 1σ ranges for the$ {\tau ^ + }{\tau ^ - }$ and$ \gamma \gamma $ channels, respectively.Specifically, Fig. 5, which should have displayed the coverage ability of the CEPC for surviving samples, incorrectly shows the content of Fig. 4, resulting in duplication with Fig. 4. The version of Fig. 5 provided in this document serve as errata for the corresponding figure in the published paper.
These errors may have arisen from oversights during the document typesetting process. All formulas and conclusions in the main text remain unaffected by these corrections, and no other changes are required.
-
This paper was published online on March 2026 with display errors in Fig. 5.
Figure 5. (color online) The coverage ability of CEPC for surviving samples in the
$ {\mu _{\tau \tau }}$ versus$ {\mu _{\gamma \gamma }}$ plane at$ \sqrt s $ = 210 GeV (left panel) and$ \sqrt s $ = 240 GeV (right panel). CEPC with L = 100, 200, 800, and 1.22 can cover the red, yellow, blue, and green samples at the 5σ level, respectively. All the surviving samples can be covered at 5σ for$ \sqrt s $ = 210 GeV with L = 800 and$ \sqrt s $ = 240 GeV with L = 1.22. The red star marks the best-fit point. The green and purple shaded bands indicate the experimental 1σ ranges for the$ {\tau ^ + }{\tau ^ - }$ and$ \gamma \gamma $ channels, respectively.Specifically, Fig. 5, which should have displayed the coverage ability of the CEPC for surviving samples, incorrectly shows the content of Fig. 4, resulting in duplication with Fig. 4. The version of Fig. 5 provided in this document serve as errata for the corresponding figure in the published paper.
These errors may have arisen from oversights during the document typesetting process. All formulas and conclusions in the main text remain unaffected by these corrections, and no other changes are required.
-
This paper was published online on March 2026 with display errors in Fig. 5.
Figure 5. (color online) The coverage ability of CEPC for surviving samples in the
$ {\mu _{\tau \tau }}$ versus$ {\mu _{\gamma \gamma }}$ plane at$ \sqrt s $ = 210 GeV (left panel) and$ \sqrt s $ = 240 GeV (right panel). CEPC with L = 100, 200, 800, and 1.22 can cover the red, yellow, blue, and green samples at the 5σ level, respectively. All the surviving samples can be covered at 5σ for$ \sqrt s $ = 210 GeV with L = 800 and$ \sqrt s $ = 240 GeV with L = 1.22. The red star marks the best-fit point. The green and purple shaded bands indicate the experimental 1σ ranges for the$ {\tau ^ + }{\tau ^ - }$ and$ \gamma \gamma $ channels, respectively.Specifically, Fig. 5, which should have displayed the coverage ability of the CEPC for surviving samples, incorrectly shows the content of Fig. 4, resulting in duplication with Fig. 4. The version of Fig. 5 provided in this document serve as errata for the corresponding figure in the published paper.
These errors may have arisen from oversights during the document typesetting process. All formulas and conclusions in the main text remain unaffected by these corrections, and no other changes are required.
Erratum: Testing a 95 GeV Scalar at the CEPC with Machine Learning [Chin. Phys. C 50(3): 031001 (2026)]
- Received Date: 2025-08-18
- Available Online: 2026-05-15
Abstract:
DownLoad: