A geometric factor calculation method based on the isotropic flux assumption

ZHAO Xiao-Yun; WANG Huan-Yu; WU Feng; MENG Xiang-Cheng; MA Yu-Qian; LU Hong; WANG Hui; WANG Ping; LI Xin-Qiao; XU Yan-Bin; SHI Feng; JIANG Wen-Qi; AN Zhen-Hua; YU Xiao-Xia; LIU Han-Yi

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/37/12/126201

Chinese Physics C> 2013, Vol. 37> Issue(12) : 126201 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/12/126201

A geometric factor calculation method based on the isotropic flux assumption

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
One of the instruments onboard the China Seismic Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES) is the Low Energy Particle Detector (LEPD). The primary objective of LEPD is to provide measurements of the fluxes, energy spectra and pitch angles of 100 keV to 10 MeV electrons and protons from 2 to 50 MeV in the Earth's magnetosphere. The geometric factor is one of the principle parameters of a detector, which converts the physical quantity-count rate to the particle quantity-flux. In this paper, we calculated the geometric factor of LEPD via computer modeling of an isotropic radiation environment. It was first demonstrated that the radiation intensity related should obey a cosine-law, then a general sampling method of generating this distribution via GPS of GEANT4 was explained. Furthermore, combined with flux normalization, a comparison of the geometric factor calculation of a set of 2-layer detectors with different shapes (cylinder, truncated cone and rectangle) was performed. Results show a generally good agreement between simulation and analytical calculations for the cylinder and truncated cone detectors, and the result of the rectangular one, for which there is no accurate analytical formula, is consistent with the previous simulated results by others. As a practical instance of the 2-layer rectangle detector, the geometric factor of LEPD is 10.336±0.036 m cm²·sr for 10 MeV proton and 8.211±0.032 m cm²·sr for 8 MeV electron.

[1]	Qi Meng , Qian Wu , Peng Cheng , Jialun Ping , Hongshi Zong . Calculation of dissociation temperature of quarkonium using Gaussian Expansion Method. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(8): 083103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/8/083103
[2]	Ming Xiao , Jie Gao , Dou Wang , Feng Su , Yi-Wei Wang , Sha Bai , Tian-Jian Bian . Study of CEPC performance with different collision energies and geometric layouts. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(8): 087001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/8/087001
[3]	Jin-Tao Zhu , Guo-Fu Liu , Jun Yang , Xiao-Liang Luo , Lei Zhang , Li-Feng Ji . A new method of charged particle identification based on frequency spectrum analysis. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(3): 036202. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/3/036202
[4]	Ying Zheng , Bin Zhang , Meng-Teng Chen , Liang Zhang , Bo Cao , Yi-Xue Chen , Wen Yin , Tian-Jiao Liang . Application of the first collision source method to CSNS target station shielding calculation. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(4): 046201. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/4/046201
[5]	Qiang Zhao , Zhi-Yong He , Lei Yang , Xue-Ying Zhang , Wen-Juan Cui , Zhi-Qiang Chen , Hu-Shan Xu . Monitoring method for neutron flux for a spallation target in an accelerator driven sub-critical system. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(7): 076203. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/7/076203
[6]	WANG Jia-Jia , YE Mao , SHI Tan , CHANG Rui , QIAO Shan . Design of a high flux VUV beamline for low energy photons. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(4): 048001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/4/048001
[7]	ZHANG Jin-Zhao , TUO Xian-Guo . Geometric matrix research for nuclear waste drum tomographic gamma scanning transmission image reconstruction. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(6): 068202. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/6/068202
[8]	HUANG Xi-Ru , CAO Ping , ZHENG Jia-Jun . A data transmission method for particle physics experiments based on Ethernet physical layer. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(11): 116102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/11/116102
[9]	H. Sadeghi , H. Khalili , M. Godarzi . Astrophysical S-factor of the d(p,γ)³He processby. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(4): 044102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/4/044102
[10]	WU Li-Wei , CAO Xue-Xiang , WANG Lu , HUANG Xian-Chao , CHAI Pei , YUN Ming-Kai , ZHANG Yu-Bao , ZHANG Long , SHAN Bao-Ci , WEI Long . Geometric calibration for a SPECT systemdedicated to breast imaging. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(10): 1019-1024. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/10/019
[11]	WANG Deng-Xia , CHEN Bing , ZHANG Ai-Lin . Study of heavy-light hadrons within a flux tube model. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(6): 525-529. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/35/6/002
[12]	DONG Yu-Bing . Pion charge form factor and constraints from space-time translations. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1342-1345. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/038
[13]	R. G. Nazmitdinov , E. I. Shahaliev , M. K. Suleymanov . Central nucleus-nucleus collisions at relativistic energies with a new method based on Random Matrix Theory. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(8): 1076-1081. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/8/007
[14]	YUAN Da-Qing , ZHENG Yong-Nan , ZUO Y , FAN Ping , ZHOU Dong-Mei , LIU Meng , WU Xiao-Guang , ZHU Li-Hua , LI Guang-Sheng , XU Guo-Ji , FAN Qi-Wen , ZHANG Xi-Zhen , ZHU Sheng-Yun . Study of magnetic-rotation in ⁸²Rb by g-factor measurements. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(S1): 188-190. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/S1/060
[15]	FAN Ping , YUAN Da-Qing , ZUO Yi , ZHENG Yong-Nan , ZHOU Dong-Mei , WU Xiao-Guang , LI Guang-Sheng , ZHU Li-Hua , XU Guo-Ji , FAN Qi-Wen , ZHANG Xi-Zhen , ZHU Sheng-Yun . Proton alignment in ⁸²Sr investigated by g-factor measurements. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(S1): 206-208. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/S1/066
[16]	WANG Wen-Xin , ZHANG Yi , WANG Ji-Jin , HU Bi-Tao . Study on spatial resolution of micromegas as a neutron detector under condition of high neutron flux and γ ray background. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(2): 110-113. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/2/007
[17]	M. Sudol (for \=PANDA collaboration) . Time-like proton form factor measurement with PANDA. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(12): 1244-1248. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/12/031
[18]	WANG Rong , PEI Yuan-Ji , JIN Kai . A Calculation Method for RF Couplers Design Based on Numerical Simulation by Microwave Studio. Chinese Physics C, 2006, 30(6): 566-570.
[19]	Liu Qingjun , Zhao Weiqin . Geometric and Fragmentation Effects in Leading Particle Rapidity Distributions for High-energy p-A Collisions. Chinese Physics C, 1995, 19(S2): 165-172.
[20]	Sun Changpu , Zhang Linzhi . Berry's Phase Factor in a Moving Reference Frame and Its Observable Effects in Physics. Chinese Physics C, 1990, 14(S1): 71-81.

Access

Get Citation

ZHAO Xiao-Yun, WANG Huan-Yu, WU Feng, MENG Xiang-Cheng, MA Yu-Qian, LU Hong, WANG Hui, WANG Ping, LI Xin-Qiao, XU Yan-Bin, SHI Feng, JIANG Wen-Qi, AN Zhen-Hua, YU Xiao-Xia and LIU Han-Yi. A geometric factor calculation method based on the isotropic flux assumption[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(12): 126201. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/12/126201

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2013-02-19
Revised: 2013-04-02

Article Metric

Article Views(2236)
PDF Downloads(291)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

A geometric factor calculation method based on the isotropic flux assumption

Corresponding author: ZHAO Xiao-Yun,

Corresponding author: WANG Huan-Yu,

Received Date: 2013-02-19

Accepted Date: 2013-04-02

Available Online: 2013-12-05

Abstract: One of the instruments onboard the China Seismic Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES) is the Low Energy Particle Detector (LEPD). The primary objective of LEPD is to provide measurements of the fluxes, energy spectra and pitch angles of 100 keV to 10 MeV electrons and protons from 2 to 50 MeV in the Earth's magnetosphere. The geometric factor is one of the principle parameters of a detector, which converts the physical quantity-count rate to the particle quantity-flux. In this paper, we calculated the geometric factor of LEPD via computer modeling of an isotropic radiation environment. It was first demonstrated that the radiation intensity related should obey a cosine-law, then a general sampling method of generating this distribution via GPS of GEANT4 was explained. Furthermore, combined with flux normalization, a comparison of the geometric factor calculation of a set of 2-layer detectors with different shapes (cylinder, truncated cone and rectangle) was performed. Results show a generally good agreement between simulation and analytical calculations for the cylinder and truncated cone detectors, and the result of the rectangular one, for which there is no accurate analytical formula, is consistent with the previous simulated results by others. As a practical instance of the 2-layer rectangle detector, the geometric factor of LEPD is 10.336±0.036 m cm²·sr for 10 MeV proton and 8.211±0.032 m cm²·sr for 8 MeV electron.

A geometric factor calculation method based on the isotropic flux assumption

Abstract：

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article